Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25558

Re: Java vs C++

Path	csiph.com!eeepc.pasdenom.info!news.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.16.MISMATCH!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe21.iad.POSTED!00000000!not-for-mail
From	Owen Jacobson <angrybaldguy@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Message-ID	<2011020510425674637-angrybaldguy@gmailcom> (permalink)
References	<iijbfr$pb2$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Subject	Re: Java vs C++
User-Agent	Unison/2.1.3
Lines	21
X-Complaints-To	abuse@UsenetServer.com
NNTP-Posting-Date	Sat, 05 Feb 2011 15:42:56 UTC
Date	Sat, 5 Feb 2011 10:42:56 -0500
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:25558

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2011-02-05 06:15:07 -0500, Lawrence D'Oliveiro said:

> This PDF copy of “The Java Language Specification”, 3rd Edition, that I’m
> currently reading, has 684 pages. By comparison, the paper copy of “The C++
> Standard” on my bookshelf has 782 numbered pages. As you can see, Java is no
> longer that far off C++ in complexity.

This is an extremely dubious measure of complexity. The Common Lisp 
specification is over a thousand pages long in some editions*, but Lisp 
is generally considered a much simpler language than either C++ or Java.

You've posted extensively about things you see in Java that you don't 
like, and there's a strong "C++ is better" undercurrent to your posts. 
While I disagree with the undercurrent, I will defend to the death your 
right to program in C++ instead. Just, please, go away.

-o

* <http://www.cs.cmu.edu/Groups/AI/html/cltl/cltl2.html>, which 
predates the ANSI spec.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Java vs C++ Owen Jacobson <angrybaldguy@gmail.com> - 2011-02-05 10:42 -0500
  Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-08 09:22 +1300
    Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:57 -0500
  Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:56 -0500
    Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-08 16:06 +1300
      Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 22:17 -0500
  Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 12:23 +1300
    Re: Java vs C++ Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-02-07 07:37 -0500
    Re: Java vs C++ Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-06 20:08 -0500
  Re: Java vs C++ Helium Balloon <hb.3459s._jsf3k@goo.abvg> - 2011-02-06 19:55 -0500
  Re: Java vs C++ Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-02-07 13:29 +1300
  Re: Java vs C++ Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-02-06 09:34 -0400

csiph-web