Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4574

Re: analysis of java application logs

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!selfless.tophat.at!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!r20g2000yqd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From Ulrich Scholz <d7@thispla.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: analysis of java application logs
Date Wed, 25 May 2011 06:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
Organization http://groups.google.com
Lines 20
Message-ID <1a96b712-59cd-4571-953b-eadaa0ec5322@r20g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> (permalink)
References <bd933ace-5641-4711-9105-4e949a602b87@c1g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <irdmdc$hfg$1@news.albasani.net> <ire4op$fgq$1@dont-email.me> <ireave$1m2$1@news.albasani.net> <QnACp.3859$cs1.1878@newsfe15.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Host 62.156.183.195
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Trace posting.google.com 1306328415 16938 127.0.0.1 (25 May 2011 13:00:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date Wed, 25 May 2011 13:00:15 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info r20g2000yqd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=62.156.183.195; posting-account=6nLwcwoAAACyuDWy5iNg9hYCXPlbqduH
User-Agent G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client true
X-Google-Header-Order HUALESNKRC
X-HTTP-UserAgent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1,gzip(gfe)
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:4574

Show key headers only | View raw

On 23 Mai, 23:32, Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3min...@eastlink.ca>
wrote:
>
> The solution was pretty simple, and it's dynamic. [...] We had to [...]
> wrap
> log4j calls with a plethora of methods that would result in messages
> formatted to our liking, but after that the heavy lifting was and is
> done: it's now up to the clients - *not* to the developers - to request
> what gets logged and in what manner.

Thanks for your answer. Your approach sounds reasonable.

But what exactly do you mean with "wrap log4j calls"?
Couln´t you just use different log4j appenders, one for each client?
The
appenders would then (i) decide whether to log a given message for a
particular
client and (ii) format it accordingly.

Ulrich

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

analysis of java application logs Ulrich Scholz <d7@thispla.net> - 2011-05-23 00:50 -0700
  Re: analysis of java application logs Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-23 02:20 -0700
  Re: analysis of java application logs jlp <jlp@jlp.com> - 2011-05-23 11:45 +0200
  Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-23 09:11 -0400
    Re: analysis of java application logs Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-23 19:16 +0200
      Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-23 15:02 -0400
        Re: analysis of java application logs Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-23 22:03 +0200
          Re: analysis of java application logs Michael Wojcik <mwojcik@newsguy.com> - 2011-05-26 14:43 -0400
        Re: analysis of java application logs Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-05-23 18:32 -0300
          Re: analysis of java application logs Ulrich Scholz <d7@thispla.net> - 2011-05-25 06:00 -0700
            Re: analysis of java application logs Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-05-25 19:04 -0300
        Re: analysis of java application logs Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-05-23 22:25 +0000
          Re: analysis of java application logs Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-05-24 12:26 +0100
            Re: analysis of java application logs Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-05-24 12:29 +0000
              Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-24 08:49 -0400
                Re: analysis of java application logs Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-05-24 14:37 +0000
                Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-24 12:26 -0400
                Re: analysis of java application logs Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2011-05-24 11:00 -0700
                Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-24 14:35 -0400
                Re: analysis of java application logs Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-05-25 09:53 +0100
            Re: analysis of java application logs Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-24 19:12 +0200
  Re: analysis of java application logs Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-05-23 06:17 -0700
    Re: analysis of java application logs Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-23 20:33 +0200
      Re: analysis of java application logs Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-05-23 19:07 +0000
  Re: analysis of java application logs CncShipper <anon@nowhere.com> - 2011-05-23 14:56 +0000
    Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-23 11:43 -0400
      Re: analysis of java application logs jlp <jlp@jlp.com> - 2011-05-23 18:00 +0200
        Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-23 12:20 -0400
          Re: analysis of java application logs Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-23 19:06 +0200
            Re: analysis of java application logs Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-23 20:27 +0200
              Re: analysis of java application logs Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-23 21:02 +0200
              Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-23 15:06 -0400
                Re: analysis of java application logs Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-23 22:10 +0200
                Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-23 17:04 -0400
  Re: analysis of java application logs Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-05-24 15:04 +0100
    Re: analysis of java application logs Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-05-24 14:50 +0000
      Re: analysis of java application logs Michael Wojcik <mwojcik@newsguy.com> - 2011-05-26 14:58 -0400
      Re: analysis of java application logs Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-30 16:23 +1200
        Re: analysis of java application logs Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-30 01:08 -0400

csiph-web