Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.help > #1292
| Date | 2011-11-05 14:06 -0700 |
|---|---|
| From | Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.help |
| Subject | Re: Enum basics |
| References | <3bo8b7dd306f6pj50v2jk3t9704n1c0cjp@4ax.com> <nospam-E313EF.20444304112011@news.aioe.org> <21054701.30.1320463633638.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prog16> <6at9b7tui212h2jvfmdkka5antnsme1qjb@4ax.com> <16418512.328.1320509703473.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prap37> |
| Message-ID | <rZOdnYZPS4bOOCjTnZ2dnUVZ_v-dnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink) |
On 11/5/2011 9:15 AM, Lew wrote: ... > Contrary to the crap you put forward, Roedy, you don't have to be a > "language lawyer" to understand the cited passages, either. Just a > programmer. Lew's claim seems to be that any programmer can read the JLS. Roedy's claim seems to be that JLS reading is a specialized skill, distinct from, and in addition to, general programming skill. This is actually an interesting question. To me, the JLS seems the clearest description of Java I have found, and is my go-to document when I want to know anything about the core language, as distinct from the libraries. However, I had studied the theory of formal grammars and compiler construction, worked on compilers, and read several other language specifications before Java was invented. I may be a "language lawyer". I'm interpreting "a programmer" as someone who can program, without requiring any other skill. This question could easily become circular if inability to read the JLS were treated as evidence of not being a programmer. So, here is a question for people who can program in Java, or can program in at least one other language and are learning Java: Can you understand the JLS? Patricia
Back to comp.lang.java.help | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Enum basics Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-04 15:11 -0700
Re: Enum basics "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-11-04 20:44 -0400
Re: Enum basics Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-04 20:27 -0700
Re: Enum basics "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-11-05 02:23 -0400
Re: Enum basics Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-05 00:51 -0700
Re: Enum basics Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-05 04:12 -0700
Re: Enum basics Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-05 09:15 -0700
Re: Enum basics Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-11-05 14:06 -0700
Re: Enum basics Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-05 15:54 -0700
Re: Enum basics Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-11-05 20:43 -0300
Re: Enum basics markspace <-@.> - 2011-11-05 19:55 -0700
Re: Enum basics Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-11-05 22:10 -0500
Re: Enum basics Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-05 04:18 -0700
csiph-web