Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #9756
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "Peter Knaggs" <pjk@bcs.org.uk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 |
| Date | Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:07:50 -0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 16 |
| Message-ID | <op.wagh7csnsu5d0p@david> (permalink) |
| References | <3a561970-391e-4f30-8dc8-049d5942f159@gi10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <2012Feb28.181840@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="GkV2GCblgsqZVxoBZTfHMA"; logging-data="6529"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18VDe0CIUUZz35Gbpdz57W0" |
| User-Agent | Opera Mail/11.61 (Win32) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:7vXUsUooniZ2jsKjllkm0njvINU= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.forth:9756 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Anton Ertl wrote: > > Why? If all systems have the string in that form in the word header, > NT>STRING can just return that. But I am worried that there are still > descendents of fig-Forth, which set the top bit in the last character; > such a system (or any other with a funny string representation) would > have to construct the proper string in a buffer, and that buffer would > have a limited life time. So, are there any systems that store the > name in a way that requires NT>STRING to construct the string in a > buffer? Yes. My new system stores the name outside of the memory module. I would need to copy the string into the Forth memory. -- Peter Knaggs
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-02-28 05:14 -0800
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-02-28 17:18 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-02-28 13:54 -0800
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-02-28 12:16 -1000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-02-29 15:42 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-02-29 06:49 -1000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 "Peter Knaggs" <pjk@bcs.org.uk> - 2012-02-29 20:05 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-02-28 14:40 -0800
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-02-29 15:47 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-02-29 08:13 -0800
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 "Peter Knaggs" <pjk@bcs.org.uk> - 2012-02-29 20:07 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-02-29 11:27 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 "Peter Knaggs" <pjk@bcs.org.uk> - 2012-02-29 20:20 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-02-29 16:44 -0800
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 "Peter Knaggs" <pjk@bcs.org.uk> - 2012-03-01 08:45 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-03-01 16:15 -0800
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 "Peter Knaggs" <pjk@bcs.org.uk> - 2012-03-02 09:58 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-03-02 22:37 -0800
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-03-04 14:03 -0800
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 "Peter Knaggs" <pjk@bcs.org.uk> - 2012-03-05 13:20 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-03-05 14:18 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-03-27 15:23 -0700
csiph-web