Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #9781
| From | "Peter Knaggs" <pjk@bcs.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 |
| Date | 2012-03-02 09:58 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <op.wajfb6cisu5d0p@david> (permalink) |
| References | <3a561970-391e-4f30-8dc8-049d5942f159@gi10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <op.wagis0zjsu5d0p@david> <431f23d7-5c19-42fe-b12f-49a6876e9b2e@gi10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <op.wahg9yoosu5d0p@david> <ac8f3530-b636-409a-8853-91eb5182bbb8@do4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> |
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:15:27 -0000, BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> wrote: > This is a side issue, since I do not think that i=j should be > incorporated into the standard, except possibly as advice, but ... > > On Mar 1, 3:45 am, "Peter Knaggs" <p...@bcs.org.uk> wrote: >>> ... is trying to convey that the parameters can change, even though >>> the depth cannot ... since: >>> ( x*i ... -- x*i ... ) > >>> ... would imply that the stack parameters are not modified. >> >> No. If that where the case they simply would not be part of the >> stack description at all. The fact that they are in the description >> means they may change and that the definition should explain how. > > In all the stack pictures I can recall off the top of my head with the > identical stack reference in the input and output side, they are > unmodified. If they are modifieable, that is indicated by, eg: > ( ca1 -- ca2 ) > > Its possible to have a class of xt's that refer to information on the > stack without modifying it. In that case, not referring to that data > that is referred to but not modified would seem to permit an > implementation to call the xt with something on the stack underneath > the specified: > ( nt -- u ) Yes. -- Peter Knaggs
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-02-28 05:14 -0800
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-02-28 17:18 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-02-28 13:54 -0800
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-02-28 12:16 -1000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-02-29 15:42 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-02-29 06:49 -1000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 "Peter Knaggs" <pjk@bcs.org.uk> - 2012-02-29 20:05 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-02-28 14:40 -0800
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-02-29 15:47 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-02-29 08:13 -0800
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 "Peter Knaggs" <pjk@bcs.org.uk> - 2012-02-29 20:07 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-02-29 11:27 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 "Peter Knaggs" <pjk@bcs.org.uk> - 2012-02-29 20:20 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-02-29 16:44 -0800
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 "Peter Knaggs" <pjk@bcs.org.uk> - 2012-03-01 08:45 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-03-01 16:15 -0800
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 "Peter Knaggs" <pjk@bcs.org.uk> - 2012-03-02 09:58 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-03-02 22:37 -0800
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-03-04 14:03 -0800
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 "Peter Knaggs" <pjk@bcs.org.uk> - 2012-03-05 13:20 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-03-05 14:18 +0000
Re: RfD: TRAVERSE-WORDLIST v4 Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-03-27 15:23 -0700
csiph-web