Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #22760

Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificingits simplicity.

Show all headers | View raw

Doug Hoffman wrote:
> ...
> I sometimes get again and repeat confused because in English they convey
> essentially the same meaning.

Like  End;  and  End. in Pascal?

Programming isn't English.  Correct use of  Again/Repeat  is covered in
Forth101.  Should a newbie confuse them they'll keep getting an error
message until the difference registers.

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. andreas.wagner@lowfatcomputing.org - 2013-05-16 09:18 -0700
  Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. "Clyde W. Phillips Jr." <cwpjr02@gmail.com> - 2013-05-16 09:51 -0700
  Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-16 09:46 -1000
    Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-05-17 15:27 +0000
      Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-05-20 03:27 -0700
  Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-17 02:34 -0700
    Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-05-17 11:21 +0100
    Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. The Beez <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-05-25 06:45 -0700
      Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. mhx@iae.nl - 2013-05-25 07:41 -0700
  Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without  sacrificing its simplicity. anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-17 12:05 +0000
    Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without  sacrificing its simplicity. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-17 06:00 -0700
      Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without  sacrificing its simplicity. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-17 07:33 -0700
        Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without  sacrificing its simplicity. Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-05-20 03:25 -0700
    Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-05-17 06:00 -0700
      Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-05-17 15:41 +0000
        Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-05-17 09:13 -0700
        Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-05-19 11:00 +0100
          Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-05-19 18:39 +0000
    Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without  sacrificing its simplicity. Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-05-17 16:09 +0300
      Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-05-17 09:01 -0700
        Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-17 12:16 -0700
          Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-17 16:25 -0400
      Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without  sacrificing its simplicity. "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-17 08:13 -1000
        Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without  sacrificing its simplicity. Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-05-18 21:01 +0300
  Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificing its simplicity. "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-05-18 13:23 +1000
    Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificing its simplicity. Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-18 06:05 -0400
      Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificingits simplicity. "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-05-18 22:33 +1000
        Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificingits simplicity. Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-18 08:50 -0400
        Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificingits simplicity. Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-19 05:44 -0400
    Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificing its simplicity. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-05-18 12:45 +0000
  Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-19 05:49 -0700

csiph-web