Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #22750

Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificing its simplicity.

Show all headers | View raw

andreas.wagner@lowfatcomputing.org wrote:
> I found this rethink of FORTH and I like what I see, but I would need to try coding
> with it.
>
> http://aerosuidae.net/reforth/
>
> Thoughts?

Nested definitions - long and painful.  There are easier ways
to hide names of words no longer needed.

Control structures employ less words.  Is it less confusing
to use the same names for different controls - or more?

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. andreas.wagner@lowfatcomputing.org - 2013-05-16 09:18 -0700
  Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. "Clyde W. Phillips Jr." <cwpjr02@gmail.com> - 2013-05-16 09:51 -0700
  Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-16 09:46 -1000
    Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-05-17 15:27 +0000
      Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-05-20 03:27 -0700
  Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-17 02:34 -0700
    Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-05-17 11:21 +0100
    Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. The Beez <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-05-25 06:45 -0700
      Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. mhx@iae.nl - 2013-05-25 07:41 -0700
  Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without  sacrificing its simplicity. anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-17 12:05 +0000
    Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without  sacrificing its simplicity. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-17 06:00 -0700
      Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without  sacrificing its simplicity. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-17 07:33 -0700
        Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without  sacrificing its simplicity. Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-05-20 03:25 -0700
    Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-05-17 06:00 -0700
      Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-05-17 15:41 +0000
        Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-05-17 09:13 -0700
        Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-05-19 11:00 +0100
          Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-05-19 18:39 +0000
    Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without  sacrificing its simplicity. Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-05-17 16:09 +0300
      Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-05-17 09:01 -0700
        Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-17 12:16 -0700
          Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-17 16:25 -0400
      Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without  sacrificing its simplicity. "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-17 08:13 -1000
        Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without  sacrificing its simplicity. Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-05-18 21:01 +0300
  Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificing its simplicity. "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-05-18 13:23 +1000
    Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificing its simplicity. Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-18 06:05 -0400
      Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificingits simplicity. "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-05-18 22:33 +1000
        Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificingits simplicity. Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-18 08:50 -0400
        Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificingits simplicity. Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-19 05:44 -0400
    Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificing its simplicity. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-05-18 12:45 +0000
  Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-19 05:49 -0700

csiph-web