Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #22723
| From | Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. |
| Date | 2013-05-17 16:09 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kn59vp$bta$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <a10033ff-f0d6-468b-8502-637ece67431f@googlegroups.com> <2013May17.140545@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> |
On 05/17/2013 03:05 PM, Anton Ertl wrote: > andreas.wagner@lowfatcomputing.org writes: >> http://aerosuidae.net/reforth/ >> >> Thoughts? > > Null-terminated strings are a bad idea. They're an excellent idea when you want to pass your strings to e.g. glibc or system libraries. That's why in Reva strings are nul-terminated behind the scenes, so they can be passed as-is (well, the address part can) to external functions.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. andreas.wagner@lowfatcomputing.org - 2013-05-16 09:18 -0700
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. "Clyde W. Phillips Jr." <cwpjr02@gmail.com> - 2013-05-16 09:51 -0700
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-16 09:46 -1000
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-05-17 15:27 +0000
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-05-20 03:27 -0700
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-17 02:34 -0700
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-05-17 11:21 +0100
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. The Beez <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-05-25 06:45 -0700
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. mhx@iae.nl - 2013-05-25 07:41 -0700
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-17 12:05 +0000
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-17 06:00 -0700
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-17 07:33 -0700
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-05-20 03:25 -0700
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-05-17 06:00 -0700
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-05-17 15:41 +0000
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-05-17 09:13 -0700
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-05-19 11:00 +0100
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-05-19 18:39 +0000
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-05-17 16:09 +0300
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-05-17 09:01 -0700
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-17 12:16 -0700
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-17 16:25 -0400
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-17 08:13 -1000
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-05-18 21:01 +0300
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificing its simplicity. "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-05-18 13:23 +1000
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificing its simplicity. Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-18 06:05 -0400
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificingits simplicity. "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-05-18 22:33 +1000
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificingits simplicity. Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-18 08:50 -0400
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificingits simplicity. Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-19 05:44 -0400
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth withoutsacrificing its simplicity. albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-05-18 12:45 +0000
Re: Reforth - A forth which fixes problematic aspects of Forth without sacrificing its simplicity. Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-19 05:49 -0700
csiph-web