Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this?

From	Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this?
Date	2012-06-29 00:47 +0200
Organization	1&1 Internet AG
Message-ID	<jsimuo$orv$1@online.de> (permalink)
References	<slrnjun9n3.ofo.hannu.vuolasaho@haikara.cs.tut.fi> <4025ef80-fb26-4c9d-8c87-3ef19ba7b632@o4g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <a5c820bf-1e81-4a71-b353-04ec89088272@a8g2000vbk.googlegroups.com> <4fec4b07.482891734@192.168.0.50>

Show all headers | View raw

Stephen Pelc wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 03:02:19 -0700 (PDT), Mark Wills
> <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>>Actually, on that subject, are there any 16-bit ANS Forth system in
>>existence?
> 
> MPE's cross compiler targets for v7 include
>   MSP430
>   68HC12/9S12
>   8051
> Fully interactive stand-alone Forths are provided for these, as
> well as tethered Umbilical Forths.

Gforth EC targets are also 16 bit.  We have 8086, R8C, 6502, and some 
more obscure CPUs like MISC.

-- 
Bernd Paysan
"If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
http://bernd-paysan.de/

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? Hannu Vuolasaho <firstname.lastname@tut.fi.invalid> - 2012-06-28 00:35 +0000
  Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-06-27 14:46 -1000
  Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? Mikael Nordman <oh2aun@invalid.com> - 2012-06-28 07:10 +0300
  Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-06-28 04:31 -0400
    Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? Heikki Kallasjoki <fis+usenet@zem.fi> - 2012-06-28 08:41 +0000
      Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-06-28 09:21 -0700
      Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-06-28 18:56 -0400
    Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-06-28 09:05 -0700
      Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-06-28 18:59 -0400
        Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-06-29 04:27 -0700
          Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-06-29 22:37 -0400
            Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-06-29 22:01 -0700
        Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-06-29 13:43 +0200
          Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-06-29 22:35 -0400
            Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-06-29 20:29 -0700
        Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-06-29 08:20 -0700
    Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-06-28 19:04 +0000
  Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-06-28 02:54 -0700
    Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-06-28 03:02 -0700
      Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-06-28 06:04 -0500
      Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2012-06-28 12:19 +0000
        Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-06-29 00:47 +0200
      Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-06-28 19:06 +0000
      Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-06-28 08:54 -1000
    Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-06-28 08:52 -1000
  Re: Can draft standard -94 used as documentation like this? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-06-28 09:01 -0700

csiph-web