Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's

From	"Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's
Date	2012-04-05 09:57 -0400
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<jlk8d1$64k$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<jlh3v1$fnc$1@speranza.aioe.org> <643edb4c9b85bb10c815e9f41d409043@dizum.com>

Show all headers | View raw

"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:643edb4c9b85bb10c815e9f41d409043@dizum.com...
...

> You're wrong, but not just about what you wrote here. And if you don't
> apologize for the accusations and manic-depressive rant you just posted
> that is going to be the last time I discuss anything with you.
>

Well, your typical reply is:

 70% creative insults
 09% disparaging the experience of others
 09% simply declaring others to be wrong
 09% exalting IBM
 03% informative

I do enjoy a percentage of your posts.  So, no offense, but before I ever
consider an apology, I need you to answer the following question.  Given my
perception of your replies in the breakdown above, what *exactly* would I
lose out on if you never spoke to me again?  I.e., you're supposedly not
versed in C or Forth or x86 or anything computing related that I'm
interested in, apparently.  AFAICT, I only lose out on the conversation of
me mostly attempting to convince you of something, unless you've been
holding back on your knowledge, experience, identity, etc that I'd be
interested in discussing.  And, wasn't it you to whom I posted that *huge*
list of topics you could discuss with me?


Rod Pemberton

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's For  interpreter. Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2012-03-25 10:30 +0200
  Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's For  interpreter. "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2012-03-25 06:05 -0400
    Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2012-03-27 03:03 +0200
      Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-03-26 15:39 -1000
        Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201203.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-03-28 11:18 +0200
          Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2012-03-30 07:04 -0400
            Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201203.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-03-30 19:24 +0200
              Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-03-30 13:00 -0700
                Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2012-04-04 16:09 +0200
              Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2012-03-30 18:06 -0400
                Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201204.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-04-02 16:39 +0200
                Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-04-02 15:37 -0700
                Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-04-02 16:59 -0700
                Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk - 2012-04-03 17:15 -0500
                Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-04-04 05:23 -0400
                Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2012-04-04 15:58 +0200
                Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-04-05 09:57 -0400
                Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201204.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-04-11 21:23 +0200
                Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-04-11 19:13 -0400
                Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> - 2012-04-11 18:22 -0700
                Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's hwfwguy@gmail.com - 2012-04-13 09:37 -0700
                Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201204.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-04-05 11:21 +0200
    Re: A short history of the stages of development and status of RP's Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201203.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-03-27 13:08 +0200

csiph-web