Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #22699

Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object

Show all headers | View raw

On Thursday, May 16, 2013 3:09:57 PM UTC-7, Bernd Paysan wrote:
> Alex McDonald wrote:
> 
> > The "current object" thread and my investigations on a prototype based
> > object model for Forth has led me to think that it should be possible
> > to construct a stack based "everything is an object" language. Assume
> > a stack where each entry is an object (possibly implemented as some
> > form of closure pointer), and where every word (including numbers and
> > strings) are objects that respond to messages/methods. These are also
> > first class objects ala Javascript; the only distinction between an
> > object and a message is the stack effect.
> 
> > For instance  1 DUP  can be considered as sending the message DUP to
> > the object 1, leaving two objects 1 1 on the stack.  1 2 +  sends the
> > message + to the object 2, which consumes the object 1 and leaves the
> > object 3 on the stack. Or  "abcd" "1" +  where the message + is sent
> > to the string object "1", producing the object "abcd1".
> 
> > var x \ the object x
> > 10 x ! \ send the store message to X
> > string y
> > "abcd" y !
> > y length x !
> > x . \ types 4
> 
> > A sizable chunk of the resulting language is very Forth-like.
> > Thoughts?
> 
> Sure this is possible, reminds me of Alex Burger's Teatime, a reverse polish 
> Lisp-like system, which instead of building on some few types as Lisp, did 
> build on an object oriented foundation (actually parts were written in 
> Java).

Alex McDonald has just invented Factor! And PostScript, Joy, and Cat as well!

None of this has anything to do with Forth.

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-05-16 13:37 -0700
  Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-17 00:09 +0200
    Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-05-16 18:31 -0700
      Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-05-17 05:38 -0700
    Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-05-17 05:39 -0700
      Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-19 00:09 +0200
        Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Ian Osgood <iano@quirkster.com> - 2013-05-25 11:36 -0700
          Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-25 13:10 -0700
  Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-05-17 08:04 +0300
    Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-16 22:19 -0700
      Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-05-17 08:26 +0300
        Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-16 22:43 -0700
          Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-05-17 09:25 +0300
      Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-05-17 00:26 -0700
      Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-17 13:25 +0000
        Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-19 00:34 +0200
          Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-05-18 15:55 -0700
            Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-19 01:27 +0200
            Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-05-19 01:35 +0200
    Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-05-17 00:29 -0700
      Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-05-18 19:38 -0700
    Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-05-17 05:40 -0700
      Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-05-17 16:18 +0300
    Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-17 12:50 +0000
      Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-17 06:09 -0700
      Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-05-17 16:25 +0300
  Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object alberto@hal-pc.org (Alberto) - 2013-05-17 14:35 +0000
  Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-19 05:48 -0700
  Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-25 19:56 -0700

csiph-web