Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #22778
| From | Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object |
| Date | 2013-05-19 01:27 +0200 |
| Organization | 1&1 Internet AG |
| Message-ID | <kn92or$pe6$3@online.de> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <kn4dhp$bs6$1@dont-email.me> <7xy5beyyhh.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <2013May17.152518@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <kn8vma$nfo$1@online.de> <4961b3ca-b7c2-4689-8f3f-67fdea7b5b23@googlegroups.com> |
visualforth@rocketmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, May 18, 2013 6:34:49 PM UTC-4, Bernd Paysan wrote: > >> Factor also complains. The right word in Factor to add strings is called >> "append". > > Win32Forth uses "append", too. place/append are pretty dated versions of Forth string handling, but yes, that's probably how Factor got "append". > And concatenate looks like this: > > \ string concatenation: $1 + $2 -> $1+$2 in pad \ from > apps\Chess\TOOLSET.F > > : $concat ( $1 n $2 n - pad n1+2 ) > temp$ place \ Save old $2. It might be in pad. > pad place \ Put $1 in place. > temp$ count pad +place \ Add old $2. > pad count > ; > >> If you are looking for popular languages overloading + to add strings, >> here's the right place: >> http://www.codecodex.com/wiki/Concatenate_two_strings > > There is a long list of programming languages from Ada, over Go and > Smalltalk to Zsh - why isn't there Forth? It's a wiki. Don't complain, just add the Forth entry. -- Bernd Paysan "If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself" http://bernd-paysan.de/
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-05-16 13:37 -0700
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-17 00:09 +0200
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-05-16 18:31 -0700
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-05-17 05:38 -0700
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-05-17 05:39 -0700
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-19 00:09 +0200
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Ian Osgood <iano@quirkster.com> - 2013-05-25 11:36 -0700
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-25 13:10 -0700
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-05-17 08:04 +0300
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-16 22:19 -0700
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-05-17 08:26 +0300
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-16 22:43 -0700
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-05-17 09:25 +0300
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-05-17 00:26 -0700
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-17 13:25 +0000
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-19 00:34 +0200
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-05-18 15:55 -0700
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-19 01:27 +0200
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-05-19 01:35 +0200
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-05-17 00:29 -0700
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-05-18 19:38 -0700
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-05-17 05:40 -0700
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-05-17 16:18 +0300
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-17 12:50 +0000
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-17 06:09 -0700
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-05-17 16:25 +0300
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object alberto@hal-pc.org (Alberto) - 2013-05-17 14:35 +0000
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-19 05:48 -0700
Re: Another OOP thread; everything on the stack is an object Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-25 19:56 -0700
csiph-web