Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #133610
| From | dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions |
| Date | 2025-06-08 00:06 +1000 |
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <8a96d5a50e33757a15ba472d5fa3ae9a171fcff2@i2pn2.org> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <nnd$470dff8c$593b4849@31279367604044df> <101vl9b$2fvp7$1@dont-email.me> <1acbb08dc9aec99e221532a95f93170fa7dbd839@i2pn2.org> <1020f14$2phcg$1@dont-email.me> <2025Jun7.114356@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> |
On 7/06/2025 7:43 pm, Anton Ertl wrote: > sean@conman.org writes: >> Why not? This was a learning experience for me, as this is my first >> actual Forth implementation [1]. The ANS Forth 2012 standard gave me a >> target to aim for. Guess I shouldn't have bothered then. > > Don't let the usual naysayers discourage you. You took your choices, > based on reasonable criteria, and you finished what you set out to do. > Great! > >>> The Standard dates backs to 1977 starting out as >>> a list of words pulled from Kitt Peak Forth. If KPF didn't have (.) etc well >>> that was just too bad. The point being nobody sat down and systematically >>> designed the standard (or forth) ground up. It was adhoc. It's always been >>> adhoc. Moore has changed his mind numerous times. What one sees in the Standard >>> is a snapshot of 1977. >> >> It seems to have concepts that have occured after 1977, or are you >> speaking of some other Forth Standard, like 79 or 83? > > The cool thing about dxf is that he always criticizes the standard, > usually for innovations that he denounces as deviations from > traditional Forth values. Criticizing the standard because of its > ancestry is a new twist in his postings. The committees keep saying they're not responsible :) >>> Even small forths can do better than what the standard offers by simply factoring >>> out tools already present e.g. >>> >>> (.) (D.) (U.) /CHAR >CHAR >DIGIT HELD MU* MU/MOD TRIM UNNEST >>> >>> I'd rather have these than all the support for wordlists DEFER and other stuff >>> the standard and folks have obsessed over. > > That's the more usual stance that dxf takes. > >> Can you not implement them with ANS Forth? > > He claims that these are already present in existing implementations, > only not standardized. For (.) (D.) (U.) that's certainly not the > case in Gforth. I said the Standard hadn't factored them out. Several forths of course have factored them out. > As for /CHAR >CHAR >DIGIT HELD MU* MU/MOD TRIM > UNNEST, I don't know what they are supposed to do, so I cannot tell > whether Gforth has some factors that correspond to them. In factoring out Standard words one is admitting the Standard is lacking.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
THROW codes and ambiguous conditions dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-05-31 11:10 +1000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-05-31 06:02 +0000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-05-31 20:53 +1000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions sjack@dontemail.me (sjack) - 2025-06-03 20:48 +0000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-05-31 13:53 +0200
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-05-31 16:07 +0000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-01 12:47 +0200
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-01 15:15 +0000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-01 19:35 +0200
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2025-06-01 19:44 +0200
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-02 14:58 +1000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-02 12:44 +0200
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2025-06-02 21:20 +0200
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-03 13:23 +1000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2025-06-03 06:04 +0000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-04 12:03 +1000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2025-06-06 12:47 +0200
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-03 06:10 +0000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-05 00:44 +1000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions sean@conman.org - 2025-06-04 19:25 +0000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-05 16:09 +1000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-05 12:17 +0200
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-06 10:47 +1000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions sean@conman.org - 2025-06-06 06:15 +0000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-06 13:00 +0200
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions sean@conman.org - 2025-06-06 21:06 +0000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-07 13:10 +1000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions sean@conman.org - 2025-06-07 04:26 +0000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-07 14:42 +1000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-07 09:43 +0000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-08 00:06 +1000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2025-06-07 12:58 -0700
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-08 01:31 +0200
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2025-06-07 18:49 -0700
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-08 13:36 +1000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-08 08:07 +0000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-08 13:34 +0200
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2025-06-10 14:11 -0700
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-08 12:16 +1000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-08 07:56 +0000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-08 13:51 +0200
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-09 00:45 +1000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-09 12:49 +0200
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-09 21:36 +1000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-09 12:24 +0000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-07 14:41 +0000
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-05 12:12 +0200
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions John <john@somewhere> - 2025-06-03 03:43 -0500
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-03 12:30 +0200
Re: THROW codes and ambiguous conditions Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2025-06-03 15:10 +0200
csiph-web