Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #21955
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Possible Forth target (Beaglebone RTU) |
| Date | 2013-04-26 18:20 -0700 |
| Organization | Nightsong/Fort GNOX |
| Message-ID | <7xr4hwojl3.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> (permalink) |
| References | <7xobd3dolk.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <kleehq$unu$1@dont-email.me> |
rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> writes: > I agree that it has possibilities. But what would be the app? It's for stuff needing more precise timing than you can get with Linux GPIO. Examples might be things like bit banging special purpose hardware protocols, controlling motors, or perhaps even making a software defined radio or digital oscilloscope ;-). Doing that in Forth sounds like less hassle than doing it with some yucky cross-assembler. I saw someplace else that the PRU's run at half the clock speed of the main CPU, which on this board would put the PRU's at 500 MHz, pretty impressive. Register instructions are apparently one cycle. I don't know about memory instructions or jumps. That info might be somewhere in the docs, which I have only glanced at.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Possible Forth target (Beaglebone RTU) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-25 01:03 -0700
Re: Possible Forth target (Beaglebone RTU) rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-26 13:49 -0400
Re: Possible Forth target (Beaglebone RTU) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-26 18:20 -0700
Re: Possible Forth target (Beaglebone RTU) rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-28 18:23 -0400
Re: Possible Forth target (Beaglebone RTU) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-06 00:07 -0700
csiph-web