Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #21999
| From | rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Possible Forth target (Beaglebone RTU) |
| Date | 2013-04-28 18:23 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <klk7bb$1no$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <7xobd3dolk.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <kleehq$unu$1@dont-email.me> <7xr4hwojl3.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> |
On 4/26/2013 9:20 PM, Paul Rubin wrote: > rickman<gnuarm@gmail.com> writes: >> I agree that it has possibilities. But what would be the app? > > It's for stuff needing more precise timing than you can get with Linux > GPIO. Examples might be things like bit banging special purpose > hardware protocols, controlling motors, or perhaps even making a > software defined radio or digital oscilloscope ;-). Doing that in Forth > sounds like less hassle than doing it with some yucky cross-assembler. > > I saw someplace else that the PRU's run at half the clock speed of the > main CPU, which on this board would put the PRU's at 500 MHz, pretty > impressive. Register instructions are apparently one cycle. I don't > know about memory instructions or jumps. That info might be somewhere > in the docs, which I have only glanced at. I looked at the link in the first post in this thread and I'd say this is more interesting. I see your smiley... lol My goal with the GA144 was only partly to produce an oscilloscope, but more because I thought this would be a good demo of how the GA144 could be used in a similar manner to an FPGA. Perhaps it is also that anything with a display is automatically eye catching. The SDR I am working on is ***lowwww*** power. I think just booting a BeagleBone would consume enough power to run the clock for a year. Well, maybe that's an exaggeration, but not hyperbole. Otherwise there are many, many ways to do an SDR. I don't think controlling motors requires much in the way of really fast I/O. I think that is more an issue of good algorithms and low latency. Also, multiplication is always nice to have. Do you have a plan in mind? -- Rick
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Possible Forth target (Beaglebone RTU) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-25 01:03 -0700
Re: Possible Forth target (Beaglebone RTU) rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-26 13:49 -0400
Re: Possible Forth target (Beaglebone RTU) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-26 18:20 -0700
Re: Possible Forth target (Beaglebone RTU) rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-28 18:23 -0400
Re: Possible Forth target (Beaglebone RTU) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-06 00:07 -0700
csiph-web