Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #134125
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth, comp.infosystems.www.misc |
| Subject | Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) |
| Date | Wed, 13 Aug 2025 12:14:14 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 23 |
| Message-ID | <20250813121414.0000180d@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <875xhmdyhp.fsf@gmail.com> <e0b2f1d0a67ca321c4f69f66bef506de768eac9f@i2pn2.org> <10161sb$3s461$1@news.xmission.com> <83c1b04b4b39bdfc05f5c0fd91cd4b1872f9d028@i2pn2.org> <2025May29.084744@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <87wm9z2866.fsf@nightsong.com> <slrn103qpjj.29gq.anthk@openbsd.home> <87zfepnjep.fsf@nightsong.com> <slrn1045m0u.1k5b.anthk@openbsd.home> <87tt4s4dwv.fsf@nightsong.com> <slrn104aoi0.2gr.anthk@openbsd.home> <87cybb4838.fsf@nightsong.com> <AdZti608eZMoyhay@violet.siamics.net> <10788vk$1g8ve$1@dont-email.me> <20250811085344.000008a8@gmail.com> <107dokd$2s7am$1@dont-email.me> <20250811145732.00004e6e@gmail.com> <107imbr$1nk0$1@dont-email.me> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| Injection-Date | Wed, 13 Aug 2025 19:14:19 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="3c3b794fc38dd097963235aebb1609ac"; logging-data="75026"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+cVJIxLm7XJi99MQzOpcrNEZ/Y+wa1V+M=" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:j9HC5nBZb1RRWoYvY/EyqYzGTUg= |
| X-Newsreader | Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.forth:134125 comp.infosystems.www.misc:268 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 18:43:07 -0000 (UTC) Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> wrote: > > It's not misunderstanding, it's rejection. > > Well, then I’d say they need to *reject* it if they’re going to > reject it, not try to use some browser that hasn’t added any new > feature support since the 1990s and act shocked that things don’t > work like they used to. The problem remains that everyone gets “the > web” pushed as the one-stop shop for all their online needs (even for > things like writing mobile apps), and that has resulted in the > kitchen sink that is the modern web browser. Support other solutions > if you don’t like the current state of affairs; I certainly do. No, I think I'll stick with active scorn and spite towards web designers who can't be bothered to do their job properly. The attitude that it should be considered acceptable for web designers to dictate people's choice of browser was contemptible in the '90s-'00s and it's contemptible now.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes" anthk <anthk@openbsd.home> - 2025-06-08 19:41 +0000
Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes" zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-08 20:41 +0000
Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes" anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-08 22:26 +0000
Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes" zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-08 22:58 +0000
Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes" anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-09 06:27 +0000
Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes" albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-09 12:52 +0200
Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes" anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-09 15:52 +0000
Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes" dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-10 11:31 +1000
Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes" Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2025-06-10 14:03 -0700
Re: "A Forth OS In 46 Bytes" Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2025-06-10 14:09 -0700
non-mainstream web (browsers) Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-08-09 14:05 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-09 19:53 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-11 08:53 -0700
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-11 21:51 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-11 14:57 -0700
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-13 18:43 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-13 12:14 -0700
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-13 12:48 -0700
standards Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.netREMOVE.invalid> - 2025-08-24 09:30 +0000
Re: standards sjack@dontemail.me (sjack) - 2025-08-24 16:05 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-15 15:14 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-15 09:03 -0700
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-16 23:36 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 07:09 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 10:45 -0700
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-18 23:25 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 08:14 -0700
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-19 21:58 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-20 00:39 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) Doc O'Leary , <droleary.usenet@2023.impossiblystupid.com> - 2025-08-25 03:24 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) "B. Pym" <Nobody447095@here-nor-there.org> - 2025-08-24 14:42 +0000
Re: non-mainstream web (browsers) albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-08-24 19:41 +0200
csiph-web