Re: enums and switch vs function calls

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: enums and switch vs function calls
Date	Sun, 06 Apr 2025 19:26:03 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	21
Message-ID	<8634ekg11g.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink)
References	<vsr0ml$1to9m$1@dont-email.me> <enum-20250405122329@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <1ybIP.1259194$2zn8.458292@fx15.iad> <86y0wdfvc0.fsf@linuxsc.com> <FtwIP.1525960$eNx6.1342019@fx14.iad>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date	Mon, 07 Apr 2025 04:26:07 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info	dont-email.me; posting-host="58fc992bf3d49f6866b08a85a8ed3f48"; logging-data="2657043"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/zY5ZiLf/0TWjL2SZP37oQKnfxD7C2jy4="
User-Agent	Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:ALFJd900O9+roIUYSVl6Vd1Owyk= sha1:ukQOAHK8Xrjos78BlavVwbT4j7Y=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.c:392139

Show key headers only | View raw

scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:

> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
>
>> scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:
>>
[... gcc verbose error messages ...]

>>> One line of informative error message followed by 5 lines of
>>> useless cruft to wade through.  And no way to turn it off
>>> completely.
>>
>> That's true, but it can be reduced to only two lines total (so
>> only one line more than needed), by using
>> -fno-diagnostics-show-caret.
>
> Yes, I use that.  I still find that the "note:" lines clutter the
> output and provide zero benefit.

I sympathize with your reaction.  My response was meant only to
provide information to anyone not aware of it.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

enums and switch vs function calls Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2025-04-05 11:29 +0100
  Re: enums and switch vs function calls scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-04-05 14:58 +0000
    Re: enums and switch vs function calls Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-04-06 03:17 -0700
      Re: enums and switch vs function calls scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-04-06 14:47 +0000
        Re: enums and switch vs function calls David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-04-06 17:16 +0200
        Re: enums and switch vs function calls Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-04-06 19:26 -0700
        Re: enums and switch vs function calls Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-04-25 01:12 +0100
          Re: enums and switch vs function calls scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-04-25 16:56 +0000
            Re: enums and switch vs function calls Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-04-25 23:09 +0100
              Re: enums and switch vs function calls Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-04 06:55 -0700
        Re: enums and switch vs function calls Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-04-25 01:12 +0100
  Re: enums and switch vs function calls David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-04-05 17:43 +0200
  Re: enums and switch vs function calls Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2025-04-05 12:53 -0300
    Re: enums and switch vs function calls David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-04-06 11:49 +0200

csiph-web