Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #392139
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: enums and switch vs function calls |
| Date | 2025-04-06 19:26 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <8634ekg11g.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | <vsr0ml$1to9m$1@dont-email.me> <enum-20250405122329@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <1ybIP.1259194$2zn8.458292@fx15.iad> <86y0wdfvc0.fsf@linuxsc.com> <FtwIP.1525960$eNx6.1342019@fx14.iad> |
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: > Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes: > >> scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: >> [... gcc verbose error messages ...] >>> One line of informative error message followed by 5 lines of >>> useless cruft to wade through. And no way to turn it off >>> completely. >> >> That's true, but it can be reduced to only two lines total (so >> only one line more than needed), by using >> -fno-diagnostics-show-caret. > > Yes, I use that. I still find that the "note:" lines clutter the > output and provide zero benefit. I sympathize with your reaction. My response was meant only to provide information to anyone not aware of it.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
enums and switch vs function calls Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2025-04-05 11:29 +0100
Re: enums and switch vs function calls scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-04-05 14:58 +0000
Re: enums and switch vs function calls Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-04-06 03:17 -0700
Re: enums and switch vs function calls scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-04-06 14:47 +0000
Re: enums and switch vs function calls David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-04-06 17:16 +0200
Re: enums and switch vs function calls Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-04-06 19:26 -0700
Re: enums and switch vs function calls Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-04-25 01:12 +0100
Re: enums and switch vs function calls scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-04-25 16:56 +0000
Re: enums and switch vs function calls Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-04-25 23:09 +0100
Re: enums and switch vs function calls Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-04 06:55 -0700
Re: enums and switch vs function calls Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-04-25 01:12 +0100
Re: enums and switch vs function calls David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-04-05 17:43 +0200
Re: enums and switch vs function calls Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2025-04-05 12:53 -0300
Re: enums and switch vs function calls David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-04-06 11:49 +0200
csiph-web