Re: enums and switch vs function calls

From	Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: enums and switch vs function calls
Date	2025-04-25 23:09 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<87zfg3hp05.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <1ybIP.1259194$2zn8.458292@fx15.iad> <86y0wdfvc0.fsf@linuxsc.com> <FtwIP.1525960$eNx6.1342019@fx14.iad> <87bjslhzfd.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <E8POP.99689$oJg.83920@fx17.iad>

Show all headers | View raw

scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:

> Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> writes:
>>scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:
>>
>>> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
...
>>>>That's true, but it can be reduced to only two lines total (so only one
>>>>line more than needed), by using -fno-diagnostics-show-caret.
>>>
>>> Yes, I use that.  I still find that the "note:" lines clutter the
>>> output and provide zero benefit.
>>
>>Does
>>
>>  gcc -fcompare-debug-second -fno-diagnostics-show-caret
>
> We use the latter.  It doesn't get rid of the 'note' sections, however.
>
> For some reason, -fcompare-debug-second is commented out in our Makefile, but
> it appears that only applies in when a second compile is required.

It appears to have a second "side-effect" use.  It removes notes when I
use it.

-- 
Ben.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

enums and switch vs function calls Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2025-04-05 11:29 +0100
  Re: enums and switch vs function calls scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-04-05 14:58 +0000
    Re: enums and switch vs function calls Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-04-06 03:17 -0700
      Re: enums and switch vs function calls scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-04-06 14:47 +0000
        Re: enums and switch vs function calls David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-04-06 17:16 +0200
        Re: enums and switch vs function calls Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-04-06 19:26 -0700
        Re: enums and switch vs function calls Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-04-25 01:12 +0100
          Re: enums and switch vs function calls scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-04-25 16:56 +0000
            Re: enums and switch vs function calls Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-04-25 23:09 +0100
              Re: enums and switch vs function calls Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-04 06:55 -0700
        Re: enums and switch vs function calls Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-04-25 01:12 +0100
  Re: enums and switch vs function calls David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-04-05 17:43 +0200
  Re: enums and switch vs function calls Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2025-04-05 12:53 -0300
    Re: enums and switch vs function calls David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-04-06 11:49 +0200

csiph-web