Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #456

Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines

From Deanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Subject Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines
Date 2011-10-07 17:34 +0100
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <j6n9ms$7c8$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <01cc847e$07167600$6d01a8c0@k8s8x> <4e8e56c9$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <j6lo80$9t0$1@dont-email.me> <j6mci3$qdf$1@speranza.aioe.org> <te5u8790j2qgugvss4tnu11ffiv0oiis6j@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 07/10/2011 16:26, ralph wrote:
>      Procedurename argument
> is not semantically the same as
>      Procedurename (argument)
>
> However, I disagree with the characterization that it is a 'bug' or
> that the results should even be 'unexpected'. The grammatic rules for
> calling VB procedures and using parathentheses are very clear. If one
> doesn't follow the rules then surprises are to be expected.<g>

Of course, but I expect people to not read/know the rules and so will 
not be expecting defined behaviour :p
That and the amount of people I've had to tell this to when they were 
bitten by it...

-- 
Dee Earley (dee.earley@icode.co.uk)
i-Catcher Development Team
http://www.icode.co.uk/icatcher/

iCode Systems

(Replies direct to my email address will be ignored.
Please reply to the group.)

Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 05:48 +1100
  Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Bob Butler" <bob_butler@cox.invalid> - 2011-10-06 13:54 -0700
    Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 10:39 +1100
      Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Bob Butler" <bob_butler@cox.invalid> - 2011-10-06 16:54 -0700
        Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 11:34 +1100
  Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2011-10-06 16:05 -0500
    Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 10:41 +1100
      Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2011-10-06 22:49 -0500
  Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Thorsten Albers" <gudea@gmx.de> - 2011-10-06 23:16 +0000
    Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 11:36 +1100
      Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-06 23:58 -0500
        MZ Tools "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-08 19:37 +1100
          Re: MZ Tools ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-08 10:53 -0500
    Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 12:15 +1100
    Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 12:32 +1100
      Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Bob Butler" <bob_butler@cox.invalid> - 2011-10-06 19:28 -0700
        Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines Deanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> - 2011-10-07 09:17 +0100
          Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-07 10:26 -0500
            Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines Deanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> - 2011-10-07 17:34 +0100
              Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines Deanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> - 2011-10-07 17:37 +0100
              Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-07 12:04 -0500
            Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-08 05:32 +1100
              Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-07 14:30 -0500

csiph-web