Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #454
| From | Deanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.basic.visual.misc |
| Subject | Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines |
| Date | 2011-10-07 09:17 +0100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <j6mci3$qdf$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <4e8df7f8$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <01cc847e$07167600$6d01a8c0@k8s8x> <4e8e56c9$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <j6lo80$9t0$1@dont-email.me> |
On 07/10/2011 03:28, Bob Butler wrote: > > "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> wrote in message > news:4e8e56c9$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au... >> Also Bob, I have found out that if I use the word CALL it is OK as >> long as the arguments are in brackets. Without CALL as in your example >> also works but then brackets must not be used. I imagine that the two >> syntaxes are optional? > > Correct > > Call procedurename(argumentlist) > -or- > procedurename argumentlist And just a warning that while mixing them is syntactically valid for one parameter, it does NOT always do what you expect and will catch you out with a bug at some point: procedurename (argument) It evaluates 'argument', which for objects, gets the default property, and other types, converts to a variant with an implicit byval. -- Dee Earley (dee.earley@icode.co.uk) i-Catcher Development Team http://www.icode.co.uk/icatcher/ iCode Systems (Replies direct to my email address will be ignored. Please reply to the group.)
Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 05:48 +1100
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Bob Butler" <bob_butler@cox.invalid> - 2011-10-06 13:54 -0700
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 10:39 +1100
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Bob Butler" <bob_butler@cox.invalid> - 2011-10-06 16:54 -0700
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 11:34 +1100
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2011-10-06 16:05 -0500
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 10:41 +1100
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2011-10-06 22:49 -0500
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Thorsten Albers" <gudea@gmx.de> - 2011-10-06 23:16 +0000
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 11:36 +1100
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-06 23:58 -0500
MZ Tools "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-08 19:37 +1100
Re: MZ Tools ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-08 10:53 -0500
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 12:15 +1100
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 12:32 +1100
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Bob Butler" <bob_butler@cox.invalid> - 2011-10-06 19:28 -0700
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines Deanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> - 2011-10-07 09:17 +0100
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-07 10:26 -0500
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines Deanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> - 2011-10-07 17:34 +0100
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines Deanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> - 2011-10-07 17:37 +0100
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-07 12:04 -0500
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-08 05:32 +1100
Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-07 14:30 -0500
csiph-web