Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #451

Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines

From "Bob Butler" <bob_butler@cox.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Subject Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines
Date 2011-10-06 19:28 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <j6lo80$9t0$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <4e8df7f8$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <01cc847e$07167600$6d01a8c0@k8s8x> <4e8e56c9$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>

Show all headers | View raw


"Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> wrote in message 
news:4e8e56c9$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> Also Bob, I have found out that if I use the word CALL it is OK as long as 
> the arguments are in brackets. Without CALL as in your example also works 
> but then brackets must not be used. I imagine that the two syntaxes are 
> optional?

Correct

Call procedurename(argumentlist)
-or-
procedurename argumentlist

Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 05:48 +1100
  Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Bob Butler" <bob_butler@cox.invalid> - 2011-10-06 13:54 -0700
    Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 10:39 +1100
      Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Bob Butler" <bob_butler@cox.invalid> - 2011-10-06 16:54 -0700
        Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 11:34 +1100
  Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2011-10-06 16:05 -0500
    Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 10:41 +1100
      Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2011-10-06 22:49 -0500
  Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Thorsten Albers" <gudea@gmx.de> - 2011-10-06 23:16 +0000
    Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 11:36 +1100
      Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-06 23:58 -0500
        MZ Tools "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-08 19:37 +1100
          Re: MZ Tools ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-08 10:53 -0500
    Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 12:15 +1100
    Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-07 12:32 +1100
      Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Bob Butler" <bob_butler@cox.invalid> - 2011-10-06 19:28 -0700
        Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines Deanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> - 2011-10-07 09:17 +0100
          Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-07 10:26 -0500
            Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines Deanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> - 2011-10-07 17:34 +0100
              Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines Deanna Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> - 2011-10-07 17:37 +0100
              Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-07 12:04 -0500
            Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines "Dimmer" <Dimmer@Best.com> - 2011-10-08 05:32 +1100
              Re: Newbie question about nested subroutines ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.net> - 2011-10-07 14:30 -0500

csiph-web