Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.basic.misc > #199
| From | Schmidt <sss@online.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.lang.vb, alt.comp.lang.visualbasic, comp.lang.basic.misc, comp.lang.basic.visual.misc, microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb, microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb.upgrade |
| Subject | Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET |
| Date | 2012-01-11 21:02 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jekpsc$e1c$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <je49ej$37u$2@dont-email.me> <elbng7hgfr19n3iogrj1t3hhv3gna0obel@4ax.com> <jehhcq$otj$1@dont-email.me> <jehrlu$nk4$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
Am 10.01.2012 18:14, schrieb Tom Shelton: > ... but, .net is not dead. It's now in the same way "not dead", as VB6 is... Welcome to the club! Really funny, that we are back now, to the combination of 'C++ and COM' as the only recommended way to develop serious and new "native Desktop-Apps" (because any other (MS-)tools cannot be considered "future-proof" or "safe with regards to line-of-code-investments"). IIRC we had this C++/COM combination already some 15 years ago, followed up by VB5/6-RAD to "develop COM-Apps even faster". So VB6 is yet a good tool, working "directly on top" of the current "state of the art tech". That much to selling us .NET as "technologic innovation" and urging us "to move on". Seems that the serious code-bases will always be C/C++ (as the best compromise, to abstract a language from the hardware). All the rest on top of it is (at least in MS' Book) apparently considered "throw-away software". The invention of COM, as a kind of objectoriented, (class-hosting and selfdescribing) library-format seems at least a well-surviving idea. As was VB-classic, as a glue-language for COMponents as well. It does its job even today, and will do so also on Win8. Aside from, that the new RAD-kid on the "blog" is now apparently the HTML/JS combination (and accompanying new IDEs, to "glue stuff together this way", including automatic uploads into the great new world of App-Stores). Let's see, how this works out - and what VB6/COM-based Apps on the Win8-Desktop are good for in the long run. Olaf
Back to comp.lang.basic.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> - 2012-01-04 18:23 -0500
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2012-01-05 09:25 -0500
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET "Thorsten Albers" <gudea@gmx.de> - 2012-01-05 16:33 +0000
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET Helmut_Meukel <Helmut_Meukel@bn-hof.invalid> - 2012-01-05 22:32 +0100
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2012-01-06 02:50 +0000
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET Tony Toews <ttoews@telusplanet.net> - 2012-01-09 20:29 -0700
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2012-01-10 09:22 -0500
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-01-10 10:14 -0700
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2012-01-10 17:04 -0500
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET Schmidt <sss@online.de> - 2012-01-11 21:02 +0100
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET "Henning" <computer_hero@coldmail.com> - 2012-01-12 15:33 +0100
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-01-12 09:34 -0700
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET Schmidt <sss@online.de> - 2012-01-13 20:17 +0100
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-01-13 13:22 -0700
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2012-01-13 16:07 -0500
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-01-13 14:14 -0700
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2012-01-13 20:58 -0500
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET Tony Toews <ttoews@telusplanet.net> - 2012-01-19 19:10 -0700
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET Schmidt <sss@online.de> - 2012-01-14 00:12 +0100
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET "Henning" <computer_hero@coldmail.com> - 2012-01-14 00:24 +0100
Re: Upgrading older VB programs (sans Project Files) to VB.NET Schmidt <sss@online.de> - 2012-01-14 00:58 +0100
csiph-web