Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #3354
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | Martin Ward <mwardgkc@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Are there different programming languages that are compiled to the same intermediate language? |
| Date | Tue, 31 Jan 2023 14:04:39 +0000 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Sender | johnl@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <23-01-092@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| Reply-To | martin@gkc.org.uk |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Injection-Info | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="50034"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
| Keywords | translator, theory |
| Posted-Date | 31 Jan 2023 12:58:22 EST |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.compilers:3354 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 30/01/2023 10:00, John Levine wrote: > [Remember that while the halting problem is insoluble in general, it's > often soluble in specific cases, e.g. "halt" or "foo: goto foo". More usefully, there are methods for transforming a formal specification into an executable implementation which preserve semantic equivalence, and therefore are guaranteed to produce a terminating program (for input states for which the specification is defined). For example: "Provably Correct Derivation of Algorithms Using FermaT" Martin Ward and Hussein Zedan Formal Aspects of Computing, September 2014. Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 993--1031, 2014-09-01, ISSN: 0934-5043 doi:dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00165-013-0287-2 http://www.gkc.org.uk/martin/papers/trans-prog-t.pdf > Nevertheless, I would be quite surprised if anyone could prove a > non-toy translator correct. -John] According to this paper: "The state of the art [as of 2014] is the CompCert compiler, which compiles almost all of the C language to PowerPC, ARM and x86 assembly and has been mechanically verified using the Coq proof assistant." Xavier Leroy. "Formally verifying a compiler: Why? How? How far?". CGO 2011 - 9th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization, Apr 2011, Chamonix, France. ⟨10.1109/CGO.2011.5764668⟩. ⟨hal-01091800⟩ https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01091800 -- Martin Dr Martin Ward | Email: martin@gkc.org.uk | http://www.gkc.org.uk G.K.Chesterton site: http://www.gkc.org.uk/gkc | Erdos number: 4
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Are there different programming languages that are compiled to the same intermediate language? Martin Ward <mwardgkc@gmail.com> - 2023-01-31 14:04 +0000
Re: Are there different programming languages that are compiled to the same intermediate language? arnold@freefriends.org (Aharon Robbins) - 2023-02-01 08:07 +0000
Re: Software proofs, was Are there different programming languages that are compiled to the same intermediate language? Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 15:14 +0000
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 16:14 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-06 13:26 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2023-02-07 14:31 +0100
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-08 01:10 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-09 00:26 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-11 00:01 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2023-02-12 04:37 +0000
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2023-02-08 10:19 +0000
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2023-02-10 19:11 +0100
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-10 23:47 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2023-02-11 22:34 +0000
Re: old floating point, C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-11 22:48 -0800
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2023-02-08 15:24 +0100
Re: C arithmetic, was Software proofs, was Are there different gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2023-02-09 00:37 -0800
csiph-web