Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #2660
| Path | csiph.com!xmission!usenet.csail.mit.edu!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: 8086 register allocation |
| Date | Tue, 11 May 2021 03:35:11 +0200 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Lines | 20 |
| Sender | news@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <21-05-008@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <21-05-005@comp.compilers> <21-05-007@comp.compilers> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Info | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="73561"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
| Keywords | arithmetic, architecture, comment |
| Posted-Date | 10 May 2021 22:42:28 EDT |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| In-Reply-To | <21-05-007@comp.compilers> |
| Content-Language | de-DE |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.compilers:2660 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 5/10/21 11:49 PM, gah4 wrote: > It was also designed to have a virtual stack, which would spill to memory > on overflow, and back on underflow. That sounds nice, but it seems that > no-one tried to write the interrupt routine before the hardware was built, > and that it actually isn't possible. It seems that it isn't possible to get some > of the state bits set, such that it all works like a seamless virtual stack. How efficient is a virtual stack? Did anybody try to use ordinary (integral...) registers with interrupt driven spilling? A stack machine is convenient for calculations. Before the stack overflows the compiler can save intermediate results, as with any other architecture of limited register count. DoDi [Normal stack machines have the top few entries in registers and do the spilling to memory in hardware. The x87 stack has 8 registers, which is a lot for a stack machine, but the spilling was broken. You can address into the stack but you can't really use it as a register machine. -John]
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
8086 register allocation "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2021-05-09 14:28 -0700
Re: 8086 register allocation Fernando <pronesto@gmail.com> - 2021-05-10 04:46 -0700
Re: 8086 register allocation gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2021-05-10 14:49 -0700
Re: 8086 register allocation Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2021-05-11 03:35 +0200
Re: 8086 register allocation gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2021-05-10 21:19 -0700
Re: 8086 register allocation Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2021-05-11 09:35 +0200
Re: 8086 register allocation Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-05-11 06:44 +0000
csiph-web