Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.compilers > #2661

Re: 8086 register allocation

Show all headers | View raw

(Snip on x87 register allocation)

> [Normal stack machines have the top few entries in registers and do the
> spilling to memory in hardware. The x87 stack has 8 registers, which is
> a lot for a stack machine, but the spilling was broken. You can address
> into the stack but you can't really use it as a register machine. -John]

It was some years ago, but I read the story about the gcc code generator,
which is designed for register machines.  So, they don't quite treat it
as a register machine, but not a stack machine, either.

At any point in the code, there should be a known (constant) number
of items on the stack, so you can address the registers using that number.
I think that is what Intel expected, when they wrote that you can use
it as a register machine.  It would be less fun in assembly, though.

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

8086 register allocation "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2021-05-09 14:28 -0700
  Re: 8086 register allocation Fernando <pronesto@gmail.com> - 2021-05-10 04:46 -0700
  Re: 8086 register allocation gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2021-05-10 14:49 -0700
    Re: 8086 register allocation Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2021-05-11 03:35 +0200
      Re: 8086 register allocation gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2021-05-10 21:19 -0700
      Re: 8086 register allocation Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2021-05-11 09:35 +0200
    Re: 8086 register allocation Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-05-11 06:44 +0000

csiph-web