Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #2588
| Path | csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | Kaz Kylheku <793-849-0957@kylheku.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Bit swizzling |
| Date | Sat, 5 Sep 2020 20:15:50 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Lines | 12 |
| Sender | news@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <20-09-017@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <20-09-014@comp.compilers> |
| Injection-Info | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="25441"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
| Keywords | optimize |
| Posted-Date | 05 Sep 2020 16:21:49 EDT |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.compilers:2588 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2020-09-05, Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> wrote: > Are there any existing algorithms which examine the operations that > must be conducted and then create an optimized / minimal sequence of > mechanical steps to conduct it given a constrained set of features > (such as those present on a given CPU)? For mapping 8 bit quantities to other 8 bit quantities, you can always use a 256 byte look up table. Of course, it's not practical for larger spaces. Still, it may be possibel to identify the possibility of involving multiple smaller look-up tables.
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Bit swizzling "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2020-09-05 12:05 -0400
Re: Bit swizzling Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2020-09-05 19:38 +0200
Re: Bit Swizzling "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-09-05 18:50 +0000
Re: Bit Swizzling Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-09-06 17:48 +0100
Re: Bit swizzling Kaz Kylheku <793-849-0957@kylheku.com> - 2020-09-05 20:15 +0000
Re: Bit swizzling "davidl...@gmail.com" <davidlovemore@gmail.com> - 2020-09-06 00:31 -0700
Re: Bit swizzling Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2020-09-07 12:08 +0100
Re: Bit swizzling Tom Crick <tomcrick@gmail.com> - 2020-09-08 09:35 +0100
Re: Bit swizzling "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2020-09-07 10:55 -0400
Re: Bit swizzling Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2020-09-08 01:45 +0200
Re: Bit swizzling gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2020-09-10 10:34 -0700
Re: Bit swizzling "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2020-09-10 17:13 -0400
csiph-web