Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.compilers > #2585

Bit swizzling

Show all headers | View raw

Are there any algorithms which take a known-at-compile-time sequence
of bitwise operations on an 8-bit to 64-bit quantity, and optimize
them down to their minimal set of operations?

For example, if I have an 8-bit byte and I want to swizzle the bits
thusly:

     Input:   07 06 05 04 03 02 01 00
    Output:   05 04 07 02 01 03 00 06

I can easily swizzle the data using a brute force method:

     v = get_value();
     o = 0;
     swizzle1(o, v, 0, 6);
     swizzle1(o, v, 1, 0);
     swizzle1(o, v, 2, 3);
     swizzle1(o, v, 3, 1);
     swizzle1(o, v, 4, 2);
     swizzle1(o, v, 5, 7);
     swizzle1(o, v, 6, 4);
     swizzle1(o, v, 7, 5);

     // Untested, off the top of my head
     void swizzle(unsigned char& o, unsigned char v, int s, int d)
     {
         o |= (((v & (1 << s)) >> s) << d);
     }

And, of course, that algorithm can be optimized based on relative
values of s and d, and if s is 0, etc.

However, there also exists a minimal set of steps to complete that
swizzling because in the operation above, bits 5 and 4 are used in
sequence.  It could be done using a swizzle2() operation, for example
and handle 2 bits at a time.

In addition, given the bit operator abilities that exist on various
CPUs there are potentially other combinations that exist behind an
operation, such as bitswap, where the order of bits flips or mirrors
across the center position.

Are there any existing algorithms which examine the operations that
must be conducted and then create an optimized / minimal sequence of
mechanical steps to conduct it given a constrained set of features
(such as those present on a given CPU)?

Thank you in advance.

--
Rick C. Hodgin

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Bit swizzling "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2020-09-05 12:05 -0400
  Re: Bit swizzling Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2020-09-05 19:38 +0200
  Re: Bit Swizzling "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-09-05 18:50 +0000
    Re: Bit Swizzling Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-09-06 17:48 +0100
  Re: Bit swizzling Kaz Kylheku <793-849-0957@kylheku.com> - 2020-09-05 20:15 +0000
  Re: Bit swizzling "davidl...@gmail.com" <davidlovemore@gmail.com> - 2020-09-06 00:31 -0700
  Re: Bit swizzling Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2020-09-07 12:08 +0100
    Re: Bit swizzling Tom Crick <tomcrick@gmail.com> - 2020-09-08 09:35 +0100
  Re: Bit swizzling "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2020-09-07 10:55 -0400
    Re: Bit swizzling Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2020-09-08 01:45 +0200
  Re: Bit swizzling gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2020-09-10 10:34 -0700
    Re: Bit swizzling "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2020-09-10 17:13 -0400

csiph-web