Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #2545
| Path | csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: The different groups and segments of object files |
| Date | Fri, 26 Jun 2020 00:09:35 +0200 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Lines | 20 |
| Sender | news@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <20-06-024@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <20-06-004@comp.compilers> <20-06-005@comp.compilers> <20-06-023@comp.compilers> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Info | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="88301"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
| Keywords | code, history, comment |
| Posted-Date | 25 Jun 2020 20:15:04 EDT |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| In-Reply-To | <20-06-023@comp.compilers> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.compilers:2545 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Am 25.06.2020 um 22:40 schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich: > AFAIR the starting > segment selector allowed to access at least 512 MB (8 consecutive > segments). This feature did not allow to break the 4GB total limit, but > it allowed for contiguous data areas bigger than 64KB. > > DoDi > [Nobody I knew used huge model because it was so very very slow. There > was no way on 16-bit x86 to access more than 64K at a time without runtime > segment calculations. -John] The 16/32 bit address size prefix inverts the default address size, i.e. allows to use 32 bit addresses and offset registers with 16 bit code. I used 32 bit offsets in 16 bit code with the Borland compilers, disassembled the generated machine code. I never used the HUGE model. DoDi [Oh, running on a 386, sure, that would have worked. -John]
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
The different groups and segments of object files Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.com> - 2020-06-19 23:22 +0800
Re: The different groups and segments of object files gah4@u.washington.edu - 2020-06-19 14:12 -0700
Re: The different groups and segments of object files gah4@u.washington.edu - 2020-06-21 01:50 -0700
Re: The different groups and segments of object files Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2020-06-25 22:41 +0800
Re: The different groups and segments of object files Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2020-06-25 22:40 +0200
Re: The different groups and segments of object files Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2020-06-26 00:09 +0200
Re: The different groups and segments of object files gah4@u.washington.edu - 2020-07-02 00:36 -0700
Re: The different groups and segments of object files Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2020-06-20 16:01 +0200
Re: The different groups and segments of object files Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2020-06-25 23:13 +0800
Re: The different groups and segments of object files Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@netscape.net> - 2020-06-25 22:52 +0200
csiph-web