Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Andrew Reilly <areilly---@bigpond.net.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch |
| Subject | Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. |
| Date | 2011-07-19 22:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <98me1mFlhaU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <3qJTp.58371$SG4.45010@newsfe03.iad> <516386065332608708.623253acolvin-efunct.com@news.eternal-september.org> <uBEUp.2630$%f4.1089@newsfe16.iad> <98h8mfFhltU1@mid.individual.net> <%GiVp.3411$%f4.791@newsfe16.iad> |
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:54:47 -0400, EricP wrote: > Ok, but what I was questioning is was there anything special about the > hardware that allowed those machines a stronger claim to being designed > for a particular language than any other system with a marketting > document? > > Looking at the wikipedia article > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisp_machine > > it seems that their claim is more than marketting as it talks about, in > the Lisp Machine Project, memory words being extended from 32 bits to > first 36 then later 40 bits to hold the data type tags. Also having > instructions that understood those tags. Oh, I didn't think that there was any doubt about that. Sorry for misunderstanding. Tagged memory was probably the big difference, but they were definitely designed with the sole purpose of running their particular flavour of Lisp. Cheers, -- Andrew
Back to comp.arch | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2011-07-14 15:37 -0400
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2011-07-14 13:03 -0700
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Peter Flass <Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com> - 2011-07-14 21:16 -0400
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Peter Flass <Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com> - 2011-07-14 16:06 -0400
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Charles Richmond <frizzle@tx.rr.com> - 2011-07-14 20:42 -0500
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Peter Flass <Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com> - 2011-07-15 07:50 -0400
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2011-07-15 09:56 -0400
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> - 2011-07-15 17:38 +0000
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Charles Richmond <frizzle@tx.rr.com> - 2011-07-15 23:22 -0500
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> - 2011-07-17 19:33 +0000
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. cb@mer.df.lth.se (Christian Brunschen) - 2011-07-14 20:25 +0000
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2011-07-14 17:42 -0400
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. mac <acolvin@efunct.com> - 2011-07-17 15:31 +0000
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2011-07-17 16:59 +0100
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2011-07-17 12:11 -0400
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Mike Hore <mike_horeREM@OVE.invalid.aapt.net.au> - 2011-07-19 12:04 +1000
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2011-07-17 13:02 -0400
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-07-17 20:42 +0200
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2011-07-18 11:49 +0000
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Andrew Reilly <areilly---@bigpond.net.au> - 2011-07-17 23:14 +0000
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2011-07-19 12:54 -0400
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Andrew Reilly <areilly---@bigpond.net.au> - 2011-07-19 22:16 +0000
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2011-07-17 19:20 -0400
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2011-07-19 12:54 -0400
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2011-07-19 14:50 -0400
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2011-07-19 16:24 -0400
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Andrew Reilly <areilly---@bigpond.net.au> - 2011-07-14 22:57 +0000
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-19 16:16 -0700
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2011-07-14 19:04 -0400
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> - 2011-07-14 17:15 -0700
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-14 20:34 -0500
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. torbenm@diku.dk (Torben Ægidius Mogensen) - 2011-07-15 10:28 +0200
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk - 2011-07-15 04:31 -0500
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Mark Thorson <nospam@sonic.net> - 2011-07-18 14:26 -0800
Re: Architecture / Instruction Set / Language co-design. Charles Richmond <plano.net@aquaporin4.com> - 2011-07-20 01:10 -0500
csiph-web