Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language.

Newsgroups	comp.arch
Date	2018-04-02 08:07 -0700
References	(8 earlier) <p9ohgc$vdl$1@dont-email.me> <2018Mar31.195714@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <kfnzi2mkjos.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> <2018Apr1.184312@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <57a4ce08-cce3-4dab-b00a-bd578678d433@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID	<2f1a4757-e110-4f52-8ad5-18179fcfb0bf@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language.
From	"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Sunday, April 1, 2018 at 10:26:18 PM UTC-4, gg...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > Some people tried to tighten C somewhat, but there has been no success 
> > yet.  Here's a post-mortem of one 
> > <https://blog.regehr.org/archives/1287>. 
> 
> You are tilting at windmills over an obsolete language. 
> Let C/C++ die, it had a time and a place, now it is time to move on.
> 
> 20 years ago C was the top programming language, now it barely
> clings on in the bottom of the top 10.
> https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2017
> http://pypl.github.io/PYPL.html?country=

Most people do not need to do low-level development.  But there
are numerous major projects written in C.  Linux.  Java (used to
be almost exclusively C, is now C/C++).  VirtualBox.  Windows is
written in C, C++ and C#.  Mac OS X is written in Objective-C.
GCC.  PostgreSQL.  PHP.  Javascript in many cases.  And many more.

The C-derived family of languages comprises nearly every high-
performance language core.  A person may use a tool written in a
given language, but the language the tool is written in likely
goes back to C/C++.  And whereas the developers using that tool
do not need to use C/C++ for their coding, everything they rely
upon is written in that lower level language, just by far fewer
developers.

-----
Your viewpoint is for end-developers, not core-developers.  If
you need to be close to speed and performance you'll need to use
C, and then C++ in some cases (though you take about a 10% hit
in performance switching to C++).

If you need productivity and don't really care about performance,
you'll use any of the higher level languages.  Less source code
to write, less direct control over data processing, less chance
of error, tools designed to help you write and test your code
faster, etc.

C/C++ and even assembly have their place.  They will never go
away until THz processors are mainstream.  People always need
to write tools, and those tools need to be fast.  You can't get
a better language than C for fast, efficient code, albeit at
the expense of having to write and maintain C code.  Assembly
can be faster, but then you have the expense of having to write
and maintain assembly code.  For nearly all cases, it's not
worth it ... just for the occasional single algorithm here or
there.

-- 
Rick C. Hodgin

Back to comp.arch | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 07:39 -0700
  A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-03-27 08:49 -0700
    Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 10:05 -0700
      Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-03-27 11:00 -0700
        Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 11:18 -0700
        Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-03-27 18:09 -0700
          Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2018-03-27 23:51 -0400
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-03-28 15:11 +0200
              Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2018-03-28 13:29 +0000
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format jim.brakefield@ieee.org - 2018-03-28 07:38 -0700
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-03-28 09:02 -0700
        Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-27 22:20 -0500
  Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-03-27 18:23 +0000
    Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 11:30 -0700
      Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-03-27 18:51 +0000
        Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-03-28 14:59 +0200
          Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-03-28 16:25 +0000
          Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 11:52 -0700
          Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-03-28 13:13 -0700
          Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-03-30 02:43 -0700
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-03-30 15:16 +0200
              Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-03-30 06:40 -0700
      Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format jim.brakefield@ieee.org - 2018-03-27 20:31 -0700
        Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 05:35 -0700
          Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-03-28 09:07 -0700
        Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-03-28 16:22 +0000
          Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-03-28 11:59 -0700
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-03-28 12:01 -0700
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-03-28 12:15 -0700
              Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-03-28 13:19 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-03-29 00:16 +0200
              Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-03-28 17:30 -0700
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 12:18 -0700
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-03-28 21:58 +0200
              Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-03-29 08:57 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-03-29 11:48 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-03-29 10:56 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-03-29 09:02 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-03-29 09:45 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-03-29 10:08 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-03-29 09:47 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-03-30 09:19 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-03-30 15:09 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-03-31 10:02 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-03-31 08:36 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-03-29 09:41 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-03-30 09:05 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-03-30 14:55 -0700
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format jim.brakefield@ieee.org - 2018-03-28 16:23 -0700
              Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-03-29 08:59 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-03-29 15:56 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-03-29 15:58 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-03-30 11:35 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-03-30 12:08 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-03-30 06:12 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-03-30 14:28 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-03-30 09:35 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-03-30 16:51 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-03-30 09:26 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-03-30 15:23 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-03-30 14:38 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-03-30 20:23 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-03-31 08:28 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2018-03-31 14:05 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-03-31 17:23 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2018-03-31 15:43 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-03-31 10:56 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2018-04-01 12:44 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-01 13:03 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-01 15:44 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-01 14:14 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-01 12:02 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2018-03-31 21:37 +0300
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-03-31 19:45 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2018-03-31 17:57 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-03-31 22:50 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-03-31 15:11 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-03-31 19:53 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-02 16:08 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-02 11:05 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-02 11:36 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-02 11:48 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-02 19:00 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-02 13:28 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2018-04-03 01:39 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-03 10:30 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-02 14:14 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-02 16:11 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-04-02 22:49 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-03 08:16 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2018-04-01 12:47 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-01 12:06 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-02 22:08 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-02 14:14 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-02 16:16 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-02 16:48 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-03 11:31 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2018-04-05 07:01 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-05 16:09 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-03 11:12 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format mrs@kithrup.com (Mike Stump) - 2018-04-03 18:27 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-03 11:45 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-03 19:41 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2018-04-04 11:09 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-04 17:02 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-04 11:33 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2018-04-04 19:36 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-04 22:02 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-04 22:04 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-04 16:49 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2018-04-05 16:18 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-04 22:41 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-04 16:51 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-05 13:26 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-04 22:31 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-03 14:41 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-03 16:49 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-02 21:49 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-02 14:28 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-03 11:45 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-03 03:53 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-03 14:05 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-09 07:30 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-09 13:48 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-09 12:02 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-09 16:45 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-09 10:22 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-09 17:39 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-10 13:59 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-09 13:43 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-09 17:56 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-09 14:47 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-09 10:19 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-10 13:26 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-12 11:23 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-12 11:17 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-12 12:31 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-12 13:58 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-12 17:12 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-12 15:18 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-12 16:43 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-12 19:45 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-12 20:45 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-12 21:34 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-13 09:09 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 08:51 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 05:57 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Alex McDonald <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2018-04-13 14:17 +0100
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 06:23 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-12 21:36 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-12 23:50 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-12 21:53 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-12 21:56 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-13 02:37 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-13 02:26 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-13 10:14 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-13 03:19 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-13 13:48 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 05:35 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 09:22 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-13 11:36 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-13 05:21 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-13 15:28 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-13 07:10 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-13 16:43 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 12:10 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-13 10:43 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 09:34 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 06:36 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 12:35 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 12:36 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-14 12:15 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-13 10:58 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 11:03 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-13 11:21 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 14:30 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-13 11:36 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-13 11:31 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-13 11:34 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 14:36 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 14:38 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-13 18:58 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 15:02 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-13 15:42 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-13 16:48 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 12:48 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-14 12:48 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-14 11:13 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-14 20:18 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format matthey7@gmail.com - 2018-04-14 09:19 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-14 20:44 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-16 18:55 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 19:02 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-16 17:11 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-16 17:32 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-16 20:42 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-17 10:14 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-17 09:49 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-17 16:53 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-17 16:38 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-17 11:16 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format matthey7@gmail.com - 2018-04-16 21:59 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-17 10:01 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-17 08:31 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-17 10:03 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-17 08:27 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2018-04-17 15:28 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-17 16:23 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-17 12:33 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2018-04-17 16:27 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-18 09:12 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format matthey7@gmail.com - 2018-04-18 14:10 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-18 15:30 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format matthey7@gmail.com - 2018-04-18 17:48 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-19 08:42 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2018-04-19 13:35 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-19 13:04 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-19 12:18 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-20 16:35 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-20 15:24 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-19 11:57 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2018-04-20 15:12 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-19 12:48 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format matthey7@gmail.com - 2018-04-19 15:52 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-22 10:52 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2018-04-22 14:42 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-22 12:36 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format matthey7@gmail.com - 2018-04-19 16:05 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2018-04-20 15:15 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2018-04-19 13:16 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-19 10:29 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2018-04-20 14:53 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-20 13:23 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-19 12:45 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-20 16:17 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-17 10:16 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-17 10:22 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-17 16:57 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-17 11:33 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-17 20:53 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-17 16:38 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-17 23:13 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-17 18:21 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 09:15 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-13 16:23 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 13:06 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format mrs@kithrup.com (Mike Stump) - 2018-04-22 19:59 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format mrs@kithrup.com (Mike Stump) - 2018-04-22 19:52 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-23 08:42 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Bill Findlay <findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-04-23 14:11 +0100
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-23 15:35 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-23 11:37 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-24 17:36 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format matthey7@gmail.com - 2018-04-12 15:13 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-13 10:47 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-13 10:30 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-13 17:52 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-12 13:47 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-12 16:57 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 09:44 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-13 10:57 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 14:09 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-13 14:12 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Stephen Fuld <SFuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2018-04-13 14:50 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-13 17:26 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Stephen Fuld <SFuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2018-04-13 15:30 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2018-04-13 22:38 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-14 08:21 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Alex McDonald <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2018-04-14 11:55 +0100
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-14 11:20 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Stephen Fuld <SFuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2018-04-14 09:30 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-14 09:35 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-14 11:36 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2018-04-13 22:34 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-13 17:27 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-13 15:48 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-14 09:45 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-14 11:29 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-15 21:36 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-15 13:26 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-15 13:47 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-15 13:33 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-16 09:34 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-16 09:25 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-16 04:38 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-16 14:03 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-16 07:26 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-16 14:34 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-16 13:48 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-16 15:06 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-16 16:16 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-17 08:58 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Bill Findlay <findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-04-17 15:53 +0100
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-17 16:28 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Stephen Fuld <SFuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2018-04-17 18:05 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-18 00:00 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Bill Findlay <findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-04-18 13:35 +0100
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-18 11:20 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-18 20:40 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 07:57 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Bill Findlay <findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-04-18 13:34 +0100
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-16 11:23 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2018-04-16 11:25 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-15 15:42 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-12 20:35 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format mrs@kithrup.com (Mike Stump) - 2018-04-22 18:55 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-09 07:29 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-09 15:05 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-09 12:04 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-09 09:17 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format mrs@kithrup.com (Mike Stump) - 2018-04-03 18:53 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-03 13:12 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-03-31 14:56 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2018-04-01 15:53 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2018-04-01 08:52 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-01 12:51 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-02 14:17 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-02 12:55 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2018-04-05 07:13 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-05 18:07 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2018-04-06 01:01 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-07 08:17 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2018-04-01 16:43 +0000
                C is an antique, switch to a real language. ggtgp@yahoo.com - 2018-04-01 19:26 -0700
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-02 10:43 -0400
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-02 11:20 -0700
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. ggtgp@yahoo.com - 2018-04-02 22:20 -0700
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-03 07:16 +0000
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2018-04-03 12:50 -0400
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-03 17:39 +0000
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2018-04-04 11:53 -0400
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. Megol <golem960@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 02:11 -0700
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-03 03:08 -0700
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. ggtgp@yahoo.com - 2018-04-03 22:29 -0700
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2018-04-04 07:40 +0200
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-04 09:49 +0000
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-04 03:39 -0700
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-04 10:52 +0000
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-04 11:26 -0700
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-04 19:08 +0000
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-05 08:38 -0700
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-04 09:47 -0700
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-04 16:51 +0000
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. Andy Valencia <vandys@vsta.org> - 2018-04-04 10:57 -0700
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-05 07:55 +0200
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2018-04-04 10:21 +0000
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. Andy Valencia <vandys@vsta.org> - 2018-04-04 06:40 -0700
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2018-04-04 13:45 -0400
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-02 08:07 -0700
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-02 16:41 +0000
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-02 10:09 -0700
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. ggtgp@yahoo.com - 2018-04-02 22:06 -0700
                Re: C is an antique, switch to a real language. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-03 07:13 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2018-04-06 01:15 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-03-31 18:31 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2018-04-01 08:57 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-01 17:49 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2018-04-05 06:55 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-05 15:32 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-05 09:15 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-05 18:07 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2018-04-06 04:19 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-06 13:42 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-02 23:07 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-03 07:40 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-03 01:33 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-03 09:30 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-03 12:03 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-03 10:42 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format jim.brakefield@ieee.org - 2018-03-30 12:58 -0700
              Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2018-03-29 13:25 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-03-29 16:32 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-30 10:38 -0500
          Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-03-28 21:52 +0200
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-03-28 13:22 -0700
              Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-03-29 00:24 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format matthey7@gmail.com - 2018-03-28 17:24 -0700
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-03-29 08:49 +0000
      Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-03-28 01:25 -0700
  Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 11:13 -0400

csiph-web