Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format

Newsgroups	comp.arch
From	mrs@kithrup.com (Mike Stump)
Subject	Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format
Message-ID	<p7Lr89.1GDw@kithrup.com> (permalink)
Date	2018-04-22 19:52 +0000
References	<0d4dc7f8-1819-43e5-8082-6ff7aee5f41b@googlegroups.com> <04e76b45-029e-406f-9cd3-1e8f88d31fc5@googlegroups.com> <00f57960-d344-4e58-bd88-e197ceb656a5@googlegroups.com> <paqahj$1g3a$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Organization	Kithrup Enterprises, Ld.

Show all headers | View raw

In article <paqahj$1g3a$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
Walter Banks  <walter@bytecraft.com> wrote:
>It is worth looking at processor families that have some members that 
>have left shift and some members that do not. It opens up a whole lot of 
>potential problems.

These are not problems.  They are just the facts on the ground when
doing a port.

>How do different assemblers and compilers deal with this?

There are only two solutions.  First, the nice one, and second, the
not nice one.  All the nice ones behave identically.  A port to
gcc/clang, to be specific can be nice, or not-nice, as the port
writter wishes.  This is a property of the port, not the compiler.
Some other compilations systems might only feature non-nice solutions,
but I'm ignorant of those systems.

>Do they know which family member they are dealing with

That is one way to do it.  I would say this is the preferred solution
method I've seen.

>It is a significant two copy problem.

Weird, I'd not call that a problem at all.

>It affects fundamental optimization. Compilers that actually know
>about the instruction set that they are using instead of a safe
>subset are capable of generating better code.
>
>This is one of the reasons that Byte Craft compilers for more than 40 
>years compile directly to machine code and not through an assembler.

This is irrelevant to the above mentioned problem.  No compiler that
knows what it is doing has any problem with this, regardless if they
generate assembly or machine code, unless the asm is really deficient.
I suppose the later could happen, but usually would be predicated on
using a third party broken assembler.  In the open source world, this
can't happen.  One can always generate a non-broken assembler, if they
wish.  Again, this would be a porting issue.

Back to comp.arch | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2018-04-01 12:47 +0000
  Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-01 12:06 -0700
    Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-02 22:08 +0200
      Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-02 14:14 -0700
        Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-02 16:16 -0700
          Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-02 16:48 -0700
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-03 11:31 +0200
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2018-04-05 07:01 -0700
              Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-05 16:09 +0200
        Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-03 11:12 +0200
    Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format mrs@kithrup.com (Mike Stump) - 2018-04-03 18:27 +0000
      Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-03 11:45 -0700
        Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-03 19:41 +0000
          Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2018-04-04 11:09 -0400
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-04 17:02 +0000
              Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-04 11:33 -0700
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2018-04-04 19:36 +0000
              Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-04 22:02 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-04 22:04 +0000
              Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-04 16:49 -0700
              Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2018-04-05 16:18 -0400
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-04 22:41 +0200
              Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-04 16:51 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-05 13:26 +0200
        Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-04 22:31 +0200
      Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-03 14:41 -0700
        Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-03 16:49 -0700
  Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-02 21:49 +0200
    Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-02 14:28 -0700
      Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-03 11:45 +0200
        Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-03 03:53 -0700
          Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-03 14:05 +0200
          Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-09 07:30 -0400
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-09 13:48 +0200
              Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-09 12:02 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-09 16:45 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-09 10:22 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-09 17:39 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-10 13:59 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-09 13:43 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-09 17:56 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-09 14:47 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-09 10:19 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-10 13:26 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-12 11:23 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-12 11:17 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-12 12:31 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-12 13:58 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-12 17:12 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-12 15:18 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-12 16:43 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-12 19:45 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-12 20:45 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-12 21:34 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-13 09:09 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 08:51 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 05:57 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Alex McDonald <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2018-04-13 14:17 +0100
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 06:23 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-12 21:36 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-12 23:50 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-12 21:53 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-12 21:56 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-13 02:37 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-13 02:26 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-13 10:14 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-13 03:19 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-13 13:48 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 05:35 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 09:22 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-13 11:36 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-13 05:21 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-13 15:28 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-13 07:10 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-13 16:43 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 12:10 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-13 10:43 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 09:34 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 06:36 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 12:35 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 12:36 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-14 12:15 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-13 10:58 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 11:03 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-13 11:21 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 14:30 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-13 11:36 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-13 11:31 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-13 11:34 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 14:36 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 14:38 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-13 18:58 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 15:02 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-13 15:42 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-13 16:48 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 12:48 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-14 12:48 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-14 11:13 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-14 20:18 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format matthey7@gmail.com - 2018-04-14 09:19 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-14 20:44 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-16 18:55 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 19:02 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-16 17:11 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-16 17:32 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-16 20:42 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-17 10:14 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-17 09:49 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-17 16:53 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-17 16:38 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-17 11:16 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format matthey7@gmail.com - 2018-04-16 21:59 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-17 10:01 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-17 08:31 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-17 10:03 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-17 08:27 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2018-04-17 15:28 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-17 16:23 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-17 12:33 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2018-04-17 16:27 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-18 09:12 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format matthey7@gmail.com - 2018-04-18 14:10 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-18 15:30 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format matthey7@gmail.com - 2018-04-18 17:48 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-19 08:42 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2018-04-19 13:35 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-19 13:04 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-19 12:18 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-20 16:35 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-20 15:24 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-19 11:57 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2018-04-20 15:12 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-19 12:48 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format matthey7@gmail.com - 2018-04-19 15:52 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-22 10:52 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2018-04-22 14:42 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-22 12:36 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format matthey7@gmail.com - 2018-04-19 16:05 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2018-04-20 15:15 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2018-04-19 13:16 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-19 10:29 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format EricP <ThatWouldBeTelling@thevillage.com> - 2018-04-20 14:53 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-20 13:23 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-19 12:45 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-20 16:17 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-17 10:16 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-17 10:22 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-17 16:57 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-17 11:33 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-17 20:53 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-17 16:38 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-17 23:13 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-17 18:21 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 09:15 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-13 16:23 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 13:06 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format mrs@kithrup.com (Mike Stump) - 2018-04-22 19:59 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format mrs@kithrup.com (Mike Stump) - 2018-04-22 19:52 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-23 08:42 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Bill Findlay <findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-04-23 14:11 +0100
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-23 15:35 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-23 11:37 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-24 17:36 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format matthey7@gmail.com - 2018-04-12 15:13 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-13 10:47 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-13 10:30 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-13 17:52 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-12 13:47 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-12 16:57 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 09:44 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-13 10:57 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-13 14:09 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-13 14:12 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Stephen Fuld <SFuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2018-04-13 14:50 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-13 17:26 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Stephen Fuld <SFuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2018-04-13 15:30 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2018-04-13 22:38 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-14 08:21 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Alex McDonald <alex@rivadpm.com> - 2018-04-14 11:55 +0100
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-14 11:20 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Stephen Fuld <SFuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2018-04-14 09:30 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-14 09:35 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-14 11:36 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2018-04-13 22:34 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-13 17:27 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-13 15:48 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-14 09:45 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-14 11:29 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-15 21:36 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-15 13:26 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-15 13:47 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-15 13:33 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2018-04-16 09:34 +0200
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-16 09:25 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-16 04:38 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-16 14:03 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-16 07:26 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-16 14:34 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-04-16 13:48 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-16 15:06 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-16 16:16 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-17 08:58 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Bill Findlay <findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-04-17 15:53 +0100
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-17 16:28 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Stephen Fuld <SFuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2018-04-17 18:05 -0700
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-18 00:00 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Bill Findlay <findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-04-18 13:35 +0100
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-18 11:20 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-18 20:40 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 07:57 -0400
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Bill Findlay <findlaybill@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2018-04-18 13:34 +0100
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-16 11:23 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2018-04-16 11:25 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-15 15:42 -0500
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-12 20:35 +0200
              Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format mrs@kithrup.com (Mike Stump) - 2018-04-22 18:55 +0000
                Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-05-04 17:00 +0200
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2018-04-09 07:29 -0700
              Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format nmm@wheeler.UUCP (Nick Maclaren) - 2018-04-09 15:05 +0000
              Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-09 12:04 -0400
            Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Ivan Godard <ivan@millcomputing.com> - 2018-04-09 09:17 -0700
    Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format mrs@kithrup.com (Mike Stump) - 2018-04-03 18:53 +0000
      Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2018-04-03 13:12 -0700

csiph-web