Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.ai.philosophy > #34080
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.ai.philosophy, sci.math, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science |
| Date | 2026-04-13 09:46 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <n43ko2Fn1fnU3@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <18a54cf289c2cf37$339952$286941$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <lR-dnVEwHud10Ef0nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <18a55ee51379d354$115389$284045$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <n416ilFbhemU2@mid.individual.net> <69DBD65E.23F8@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Am Sonntag000012, 12.04.2026 um 19:29 schrieb The Starmaker: > Thomas Heger wrote: >> >> Am Samstag000011, 11.04.2026 um 19:52 schrieb Maciej Woźniak: >>> On 4/11/2026 3:33 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >>>> On 04/11/2026 05:23 AM, Maciej Woźniak wrote: >>>>> On 4/11/2026 8:37 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >>>>>> On 04/10/2026 10:41 PM, Maciej Woźniak wrote: >>>>>>> Natural and science make an oxymoron, sorry. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Science is "natural" like numbers are "natural", >>>>>> since for "first principles" and "final cause" >>>>>> that according to "science" that those are "science", >>>>>> and here, "logic". >>>>> >>>>> Your arm waving won't help, natural and >>>>> science make an oxymoron. >>>>> >>>> >>>> If it's not natural, then it's synthetic. >>>> The only reason people think science is synthetic >>>> is because they were told some vague reasoning >>>> about paradoxes and the limitations of sense, >>> >>> Why don't monkeys have any science? >>> >> >> They have, but not yet have invented the printing press. >> >> TH > > Well, how did the monkies come up with the Complete Works of Shakespeare > then? Monkeys cannot speak very well. But some gorillas have learned to 'speak' with hand signs. But that is difficult to print, anyhow. Possibly you could teach a gorilla to use a printing press, but I have doubts about their possibility to write, if the gorilla cannot speak. But maybe a system based on pictograms could be a way to allow the apes to express their emotions, transfer that to some printable form and subsequently squeeze it on paper. TH ...
Back to comp.ai.philosophy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-06 10:10 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-06 10:47 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-07 09:29 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-07 11:08 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-04-08 18:32 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-07 19:28 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-08 07:20 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-08 12:53 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-09 10:50 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 18:01 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 18:15 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-04-11 07:41 +0200
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 23:37 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 00:15 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-04-11 14:23 +0200
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 06:33 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 07:00 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-04-11 19:52 +0200
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-11 17:16 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-11 22:15 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-04-12 07:36 +0200
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-12 00:03 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-04-12 11:14 +0200
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-12 02:22 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-04-12 13:59 +0200
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-12 09:38 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-04-12 18:46 +0200
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-12 10:04 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-04-12 21:33 +0200
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-04-12 11:31 +0200
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-12 10:29 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-04-13 09:46 +0200
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-13 08:38 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-13 12:59 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-13 13:06 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-04-17 08:59 +0200
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-04-17 08:56 +0200
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 08:08 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science x3 <x@x.net> - 2026-04-17 15:31 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 17:34 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-04-18 09:58 +0200
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 07:29 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-18 01:29 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-13 13:55 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-20 14:06 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-20 19:22 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-02 12:48 -0500
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-05-02 20:48 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 08:48 -0500
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 07:07 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 09:17 -0500
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 09:42 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 12:55 -0500
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 16:21 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 19:07 -0500
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-05-04 07:18 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-05-04 07:42 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-04 10:37 -0500
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-05-04 14:07 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-05-04 18:10 -0500
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-05-04 14:10 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-05-02 21:46 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-05-03 09:06 -0700
Re: Theatheory: super-theory and natural science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-05-07 10:17 -0700
csiph-web