Re: windows 10 again..

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
Newsgroups	aus.computers
Subject	Re: windows 10 again..
Date	2 Jan 2016 19:08:22 GMT
Lines	22
Message-ID	<deqlh6Fph54U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<dep640FdlakU1@mid.individual.net>
X-Trace	individual.net nQ6aeJ0WCRVDvVTjCsqoKwQ8UufSlviWF2IEl3HJPGV6a0CYiM
X-Orig-Path	not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock	sha1:mFG6okD3ONqFzVbo5YjPzydsKEI=
User-Agent	tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-6.2-WOW64/1.5.22(0.156/4/2) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
X-Antivirus	avast! (VPS 160102-0, 01/02/2016), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status	Clean
Xref	csiph.com aus.computers:49732

Show key headers only | View raw

felix <me@nothere.biz> wrote:
> 
> It's doing another massive upgrade. :( I wish I'd never bothered with 
> it. fortunately I only have it on two computers. but why does it have to 
> do these massive upgrades? why doesn't it just do all those little 
> updates like M$ has always done with previous versions?

  Because it's a BIG POS, instead of a 'small' one?

  Anyway, 8.1 also already had 1GB update cycles (Yes, multiple
'seperate' updates, but all released at the same time on black Tuesday.)

  BTW, you *do* know that with this "massive upgrade" (Version 1511),
you can no longer go back to 7/8.1!? (See SG1's post "W10 build 1511" of
November 23 in this group.)

  To add insult to injury:

  My laptop, which was rolled back from 10 to 8.1, offers the 1511
upgrade without this warning. It's offered as an Optional update, but
contrary to normal Optional updates, it is already ticked. I guess
that's Microsoft's special category of Mandatory Optional updates! :-(

Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

windows 10 again.. felix <me@nothere.biz> - 2016-01-02 16:38 +1100
  Re: windows 10 again.. SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2016-01-02 21:21 +1100
    Re: windows 10 again.. felix <me@nothere.biz> - 2016-01-02 22:36 +1100
    Re: windows 10 again.. "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2016-01-02 20:46 +0800
      Re: windows 10 again.. Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-01-02 19:58 +0000
    Re: windows 10 again.. "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 06:38 +1100
      Re: windows 10 again.. "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2016-01-05 15:02 +0800
  Re: windows 10 again.. Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-01-02 19:08 +0000
    Re: windows 10 again.. felix <me@nothere.biz> - 2016-01-03 10:31 +1100

csiph-web