Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > aus.computers > #49618
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers |
| Subject | Re: cheapest mobile broadband? |
| Date | 2015-12-29 20:17 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <def1eeFql2tU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <dedg5rFfckbU1@mid.individual.net> <n5t0ls$1ep$1@speranza.aioe.org> <deeiehFn93vU1@mid.individual.net> <deeitmFnc7pU1@mid.individual.net> <n5t9qp$ha4$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
"Max" <max@val.morgan> wrote in message news:n5t9qp$ha4$1@speranza.aioe.org... > > "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:deeitmFnc7pU1@mid.individual.net... > <snip> >> >>> Doesn't cost a lot more than that mobile plan, $60/month instead of $40 >>> but you would normally need a mobile service of some kind as well. >> >> But you don't get a mobile service in that $40. >> So you would only be paying $20 more for adsl. >> > > I am a low mobile phone user. On Amaysim pay-as-you-go, and would spend > $5-$10 per month. I do not use mobile data and only use home wifi for > internet on my phone. > > The idea would be to use a mobile wifi modem which you insert a SIM into, > so you end up with a mobile phone account and a mobile broadband account, > and they can be with two separate providers. > > > <snip> >>Depending on what mobile plan you are already on, amaysim may >>be better value with say their $40/month mobile plan with $100 10GB >>data packs as required. You're paying $480 a year with the slut so if >>you don't use more than say 40GB a year, 3.5GB a month, amaysim >>would be cheaper. > > 3.5GB per month is not enough. What about all the Windows updates? Plus > my TV can stream HD movies which would be about 2GB each. > > > <snip> >> >>> You don't normally see any speed difference with the cheaper ADSL >>> services, and I hardly ever use support myself. I care more about the >>> cheapest ISPs going broke and being without a service for a while. >> > > The cheapest is Spintel, but I would be nuts to go with them: > http://www.productreview.com.au/p/spin.html > You hear so many bad stories about cheap ADSL. The worst thing would be > slow speeds at peak hours and this is often reported. Its bullshit and has nothing to do with how cheap the ISP is. They resell the majors and get the same speed result that the majors get on the exchange you are on. > It seems like ADSL is over-subscribed. There are certainly some exchanges which don't have enough bandwidth in the link out of the exchange, but the cheap ISPs don't have their own link out of the exchange. > You are paying all that money, It isn't much more than the $40 you propose to spend. > plus the installations costs and then you have to worry about the service > not working properly. You do with mobile broadband too. > It would be OK with a premium provider like Telstra Wrong again. If the exchange hasn't got a link with enough bandwidth, you'll get that with Telstra too. > but that is too much to pay for my needs. Certainly $40/month is cheaper than $60, but you will get a better result with adsl as far as the system bogging down when lots are using it because mobile broadband by definition has everyone using the base you are using, sharing the bandwidth. Doesn't happen anything like as much with adsl.
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
cheapest mobile broadband? "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-12-28 09:40 +0800
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2015-12-28 02:12 +0000
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-12-28 10:25 +0800
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2015-12-28 14:18 +1100
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-12-28 07:16 +0000
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 16:50 +1100
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-12-28 14:17 +0800
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 06:17 +1100
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-12-29 12:03 +0800
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 16:02 +1100
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 16:10 +1100
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-12-29 14:39 +0800
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 20:17 +1100
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-12-29 16:06 +0000
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-12-30 07:15 +0800
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-12-30 16:52 +0000
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2015-12-30 22:42 +0000
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? "Damian" <dd_damian@gmail.com> - 2015-12-28 22:22 +1100
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 06:25 +1100
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-12-28 20:28 +0000
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 09:37 +1100
Re: cheapest mobile broadband? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-12-29 16:06 +0000
csiph-web