Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > aus.computers > #48408
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers |
| Subject | Re: SMART self test log |
| Date | 2015-10-08 16:07 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <d7mc08F29uoU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <mv01k8$sn7$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mv36k0$qu4$1@dont-email.me> |
Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> wrote > Max wrote >> I have done a SMART short self test of the suspect hard drive. Here is >> the log: > <snip> > One of the 'features' of modern drives is a 'bank' of spare sectors. Yes. > Even new drives can have a number of bad sectors. Not ones that are visible in the SMART report. > The smarts on the drive can reallocate these dud sectors to spares in its > bank. But when its got anything like 328 reallocated sectors, its dead. > As a user you will generally not be aware this has happened. That’s what the SMART report is for. > Through the drives's life, a few sectors may go bad and these will be > remapped to additional spares in the bank. This can be quite normal. > Again, this happens quite transparently to the user. Depends on whether the data in the bad sector can be read. > The user will usually only be alerted to the increasing number of bad > sectors when the bank runs out of spares and the user will be alerted to a > number of 'hard errors' appearing. Utterly mangled all over again. > The rate of growth of these errors is the critical issue. When its got anything like 328 reallocated sectors, its dead. > Growth in the number of hard errors indicates a drive that is in its death > throes. 328 reallocated sectors indicates that its dead. > If you get to this stage, you are well advised to ditch the drive. At the > cost of them, it is simply not worth risking your data. His data has already been lost. > When I encounter a drive that is becoming increasingly flaky, I runs a few > tests and bin the drive if the prognosis is not good. I have become quite > mercenary about drives over the years. That's not what that word means. > If I cannot rely on a drive, I get any data off it and toss the drive out. > I consider any rotating platter, magnetic media hard drive as a > non-permanent storage medium. USB sticks are even less permanent storage media. > It is best if you adopt this attitude as well. That means that any data > you have that is in any way critical, you have it backed up on, typically, > another hard drive as well as a different form of media. To that end, I > have 8 TB of data backed up on 6 by 2 TB external USB hard drives. I also > have many TB more of data backed up on smaller external USB hard drives. > Really critical data is also backed up on DVDs. I once used tape drives > but, frankly, I'm over them.
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
SMART self test log "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-10-06 16:43 +0800
Re: SMART self test log "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 19:58 +1100
Re: SMART self test log keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2015-10-07 22:35 +1000
Re: SMART self test log "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 15:38 +1100
Re: SMART self test log Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-10-08 00:29 +1100
Re: SMART self test log "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-10-08 11:44 +0800
Re: SMART self test log Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-10-08 15:30 +1100
Re: SMART self test log "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 16:07 +1100
Re: SMART self test log keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2015-10-08 21:56 +1000
Re: SMART self test log Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-10-08 23:32 +1100
csiph-web