Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #221198
| From | Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: The Y2K problem - again |
| Date | 2022-07-20 16:30 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87v8rrcysc.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <r5eddhd62i4u7u6isas0di0718ol2jmk87@4ax.com> <1290829946.679945642.604258.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <uo2edhlqj57buh41kc3ltj7nkoe22somo8@4ax.com> <ImFBK.606091$wIO9.194757@fx12.iad> <qgeedh96e3jr8c1mkm9r7t11tlmlmi6jsp@4ax.com> |
On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 18:17:49 -0500, D.J. wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:29:12 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) > wrote: >>D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>Undoubtedly... but there are areas where the atmoic bombs were tested >>>out there. Best to avoid those. >> >>Why? Perfect place for solar panels. It's not like the electricity they >>produce would be radioactive. Even then, the levels of radiation on the >>surface are minimal. Not to mention that the amount of land in the >>test areas is a trivial fraction of the total. At least they let visit you the Trinity test site as a tourist attraction since decades. I doubt they would if there was any danger. > Monument Valley. a movie was made out there. Didn't that kill John Wayne? -- Andreas
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Y2K problem - again (was: Fwd: Linux on a small memory PC) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-07-17 16:32 -0400
Re: The Y2K problem - again (was: Fwd: Linux on a small memory PC) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-17 16:07 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2022-07-17 21:14 -0400
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-17 20:42 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again (was: Fwd: Linux on a small memory PC) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-18 08:46 +0100
Re: The Y2K problem - again Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 07:46 -0400
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-18 12:16 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-18 19:27 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-18 13:02 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 16:17 -0400
Re: The Y2K problem - again Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-18 21:56 +0100
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-18 21:25 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-25 09:51 +0100
Re: The Y2K problem - again maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2022-07-25 09:18 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2022-07-25 10:36 +0100
Re: The Y2K problem - again maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2022-07-25 10:15 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2022-07-25 10:26 +0100
Re: The Y2K problem - again Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2022-07-18 22:44 +0100
Re: The Y2K problem - again Robin Vowels <robin.vowels@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 21:01 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-18 21:22 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2022-07-18 22:07 +0100
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-18 22:45 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-18 20:23 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-07-18 22:15 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2022-07-18 20:08 -0300
Re: The Y2K problem - again John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2022-07-18 23:30 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-07-19 01:48 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-19 10:48 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-19 10:48 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again Robin Vowels <robin.vowels@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 20:53 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 16:05 -0400
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-18 13:13 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-18 13:15 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-18 21:01 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 16:24 -0400
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-18 21:13 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2022-07-19 09:34 +0100
Re: The Y2K problem - again J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2022-07-20 18:52 -0400
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2022-07-21 00:19 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-21 13:30 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2022-07-21 17:41 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-21 17:53 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2022-07-21 14:49 -0400
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-21 19:03 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2022-07-21 16:13 -0400
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-21 21:46 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2022-07-22 07:02 -0400
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-22 18:48 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2022-07-22 21:13 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-22 22:33 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2022-07-23 01:39 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2022-07-23 13:45 -0500
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2022-07-22 00:06 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2022-07-22 05:57 +0100
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> - 2022-07-22 20:53 -0400
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2022-07-23 01:40 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-25 10:20 +0100
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-25 14:21 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2022-08-04 22:55 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-08-04 23:19 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2022-07-18 20:25 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-18 21:17 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2022-07-19 09:00 -0500
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-19 10:48 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2022-07-19 14:51 -0500
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-19 21:29 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2022-07-19 18:17 -0500
Re: The Y2K problem - again Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-07-20 16:30 -0400
Re: The Y2K problem - again maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2022-07-20 21:40 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2022-07-20 20:54 -0500
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-21 13:35 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2022-07-20 00:09 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-19 18:10 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-07-18 21:48 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-19 10:48 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2022-07-19 14:52 -0500
Re: The Y2K problem - again J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2022-07-20 18:46 -0400
Re: The Y2K problem - again Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-07-20 20:16 -0400
Re: fun with fusion, The Y2K problem - again John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2022-07-21 00:24 +0000
Re: fun with fusion, The Y2K problem - again Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-07-21 19:16 -0400
Re: The Y2K problem - again (was: Fwd: Linux on a small memory PC) johnson <root@example.net> - 2022-07-18 12:33 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again (was: Fwd: Linux on a small memory PC) D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 11:03 -0500
Re: The Y2K problem - again (was: Fwd: Linux on a small memory PC) Robin Vowels <robin.vowels@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 20:49 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again (was: Fwd: Linux on a small memory PC) Robin Vowels <robin.vowels@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 20:47 -0700
csiph-web