Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #221284
| From | Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again |
| Date | 2022-07-22 20:53 -0400 |
| Organization | None of the above |
| Message-ID | <87k084odj6.fsf@mothra.home> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <nogCK.100017$%i2.4740@fx48.iad> <tbc74h$2hnnn$1@dont-email.me> <IphCK.599646$JVi.56751@fx17.iad> <tbcplk$acc$1@gal.iecc.com> <20220722055717.a831d7bc4742ce0f945bd481@eircom.net> |
Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> writes: > On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 00:06:12 -0000 (UTC) > John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: > >> Which, unfortunately doesn't help, since sequestration of either CO or >> CO2 is a crock. > > Yes it is. > >> A little basic chemistry tells us that you end up with more CO or CO2 >> than the CH2 you started with, same number of molecues but heavier. > > If you pull the CH2 out of the ground/ocean then that carbon was > already sequestered. What this process does is sequester *oxygen* which > seems counterproductive to me. CH2 is acetylene (ethyne). Is that really what was intended?
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
The Y2K problem - again (was: Fwd: Linux on a small memory PC) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-07-17 16:32 -0400
Re: The Y2K problem - again (was: Fwd: Linux on a small memory PC) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-17 16:07 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2022-07-17 21:14 -0400
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-17 20:42 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again (was: Fwd: Linux on a small memory PC) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-18 08:46 +0100
Re: The Y2K problem - again Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 07:46 -0400
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-18 12:16 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-18 19:27 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-18 13:02 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 16:17 -0400
Re: The Y2K problem - again Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-18 21:56 +0100
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-18 21:25 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-25 09:51 +0100
Re: The Y2K problem - again maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2022-07-25 09:18 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2022-07-25 10:36 +0100
Re: The Y2K problem - again maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2022-07-25 10:15 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2022-07-25 10:26 +0100
Re: The Y2K problem - again Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2022-07-18 22:44 +0100
Re: The Y2K problem - again Robin Vowels <robin.vowels@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 21:01 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-18 21:22 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2022-07-18 22:07 +0100
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-18 22:45 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-18 20:23 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-07-18 22:15 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2022-07-18 20:08 -0300
Re: The Y2K problem - again John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2022-07-18 23:30 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-07-19 01:48 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-19 10:48 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-19 10:48 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again Robin Vowels <robin.vowels@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 20:53 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 16:05 -0400
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-18 13:13 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-18 13:15 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-18 21:01 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 16:24 -0400
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-18 21:13 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2022-07-19 09:34 +0100
Re: The Y2K problem - again J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2022-07-20 18:52 -0400
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2022-07-21 00:19 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-21 13:30 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2022-07-21 17:41 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-21 17:53 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2022-07-21 14:49 -0400
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-21 19:03 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2022-07-21 16:13 -0400
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-21 21:46 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2022-07-22 07:02 -0400
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-22 18:48 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2022-07-22 21:13 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-22 22:33 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2022-07-23 01:39 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2022-07-23 13:45 -0500
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2022-07-22 00:06 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2022-07-22 05:57 +0100
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> - 2022-07-22 20:53 -0400
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2022-07-23 01:40 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-25 10:20 +0100
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-25 14:21 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2022-08-04 22:55 +0000
Re: gas power, The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-08-04 23:19 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2022-07-18 20:25 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-18 21:17 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2022-07-19 09:00 -0500
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-19 10:48 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2022-07-19 14:51 -0500
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-19 21:29 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2022-07-19 18:17 -0500
Re: The Y2K problem - again Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-07-20 16:30 -0400
Re: The Y2K problem - again maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2022-07-20 21:40 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2022-07-20 20:54 -0500
Re: The Y2K problem - again scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-07-21 13:35 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2022-07-20 00:09 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-19 18:10 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-07-18 21:48 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2022-07-19 10:48 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2022-07-19 14:52 -0500
Re: The Y2K problem - again J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2022-07-20 18:46 -0400
Re: The Y2K problem - again Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-07-20 20:16 -0400
Re: fun with fusion, The Y2K problem - again John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2022-07-21 00:24 +0000
Re: fun with fusion, The Y2K problem - again Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2022-07-21 19:16 -0400
Re: The Y2K problem - again (was: Fwd: Linux on a small memory PC) johnson <root@example.net> - 2022-07-18 12:33 +0000
Re: The Y2K problem - again (was: Fwd: Linux on a small memory PC) D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 11:03 -0500
Re: The Y2K problem - again (was: Fwd: Linux on a small memory PC) Robin Vowels <robin.vowels@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 20:49 -0700
Re: The Y2K problem - again (was: Fwd: Linux on a small memory PC) Robin Vowels <robin.vowels@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 20:47 -0700
csiph-web