Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #233055
| From | Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP |
| Date | 2026-01-02 08:27 -1000 |
| Organization | Wheeler&Wheeler |
| Message-ID | <87a4yvg99q.fsf@localhost> (permalink) |
| References | <10j6l76$3oras$4@dont-email.me> <10j6lpa$3ppd5$1@dont-email.me> <87ms2wkdn8.fsf@localhost> |
Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> writes: > newspaper article about some of Edson's Internet & TCP/IP IBM battles: > https://web.archive.org/web/20000124004147/http://www1.sjmercury.com/svtech/columns/gillmor/docs/dg092499.htm > Also from wayback machine, some additional (IBM missed, Internet & > TCP/IP) references from Ed's website > https://web.archive.org/web/20000115185349/http://www.edh.net/bungle.htm late 80s, a senior disk engineer got a talk scheduled at internal, world-wide, annual communication group conference, supposedly on 3174 performance. However, his opening was that the communication group was going to be responsible for the demise of the disk division. The disk division was seeing drop in disk sales with data fleeing mainframe datacenters to more distributed computing friendly platforms. The disk division had come up with a number of solutions, but they were constantly being vetoed by the communication group (with their corporate ownership of everything that crossed the datacenter walls) trying to protect their dumb terminal paradigm. Senior disk software executive partial countermeasure was investing in distributed computing startups that would use IBM disks (he would periodically ask us to drop in on his investments to see if we could offer any assistance). The communication group's stranglehold on mainframe datacenters wasn't just disks and a couple years later, IBM has one of the largest losses in the history of US companies ... and was being reorganized into the 13 "baby blues" (take-off on the "baby bells" breakup a decade earlier) in preperation for breaking up IBM. https://web.archive.org/web/20101120231857/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,977353,00.html https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,977353-1,00.html We had already left IBM but get a call from the bowels of Armonk asking if we could help with the breakup. Before we get started, the board brings in the former AMEX president as CEO to try and save the company, who (somewhat) reverses the breakup and uses some of the same techniques used at RJR (gone 404, but lives on at wayback) https://web.archive.org/web/20181019074906/http://www.ibmemployee.com/RetirementHeist.shtml other trivia: in the early 80s, I was funded for HSDT project, T1 and faster computer links (both terrestrial and satellite) and battles with SNA group (60s, IBM had 2701 supporting T1, 70s with SNA/VTAM and issues, links were capped at 56kbit ... and I had to mostly resort to non-IBM hardware). Also was working with NSF director and was suppose to get $20M to interconnect the NSF Supercomputer centers. Then congress cuts the budget, some other things happened and eventually there was RFP released (in part based on what we already had running). NSF 28Mar1986 Preliminary Announcement (from old archived a.f.c post): https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#12 The OASC has initiated three programs: The Supercomputer Centers Program to provide Supercomputer cycles; the New Technologies Program to foster new supercomputer software and hardware developments; and the Networking Program to build a National Supercomputer Access Network - NSFnet. ... IBM internal politics was not allowing us to bid. The NSF director tried to help by writing the company a letter (3Apr1986, NSF Director to IBM Chief Scientist and IBM Senior VP and director of Research, copying IBM CEO) with support from other gov. agencies ... but that just made the internal politics worse (as did claims that what we already had operational was at least 5yrs ahead of the winning bid), as regional networks connect in, NSFnet becomes the NSFNET backbone, precursor to modern internet. Note RFP had called for T1 links, however winning bid put in 440kbit/sec links ... then to make it look something like T1, they put in T1 trunks with telco multiplexors running multiple 440kbit/sec links over T1 trunks. When director left NSF, he went over to K (H?) street lobby group (council on competitiveness) and we would try and periodically drop in on him -- virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
43 Years Of TCP/IP Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-01 20:25 +0000
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2026-01-01 13:34 -0700
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-01 22:10 +0000
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2026-01-01 15:36 -1000
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2026-01-01 15:27 -1000
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> - 2026-01-01 17:45 -0800
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2026-01-02 13:27 -1000
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-03 03:11 +0000
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-02 03:22 +0000
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-01-02 14:08 +0000
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-02 20:29 +0000
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2026-01-02 08:27 -1000
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-01-02 20:34 +0000
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2026-01-02 04:41 +0000
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-01-02 05:45 +0000
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-01-01 22:11 +0000
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> - 2026-01-01 15:03 -0800
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP Johnny Billquist <bqt@softjar.se> - 2026-01-04 16:46 +0100
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP - What was the competition Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-01-04 15:53 +0000
Re: 43 Years Of TCP/IP - What was the competition Johnny Billquist <bqt@softjar.se> - 2026-01-10 17:38 +0100
csiph-web