Groups > alt.comp.software.thunderbird > #20436

Re: "recipient rejected"?

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail
From	dillinger <dillinger@invalid.not>
Newsgroups	alt.comp.software.thunderbird
Subject	Re: "recipient rejected"?
Date	Mon, 11 May 2026 21:43:46 +0200
Organization	To protect and to server
Message-ID	<i4o9dm-053.ln1@spock.lan> (permalink)
References	<10tsk4v$1368h$2@dont-email.me> <n6ebrmFh3l1U2@mid.individual.net> <3dc9dm-5e2.ln1@spock.lan> <10tta8l$2u1d$1@solani.org>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Info	paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="2206607"; posting-host="0/a22yISprr31WJiBmbFEQ.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A";
User-Agent	Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language	nl, en-US
X-Notice	Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3
Xref	csiph.com alt.comp.software.thunderbird:20436

Show key headers only | View raw

Op 11-5-2026 om 21:21 schreef Marco Moock:
> Am 11.05.26 um 18:23 schrieb dillinger:
>>>
>> He doesn't, or it fails, he already "tried changing from
>> "none" to "password sent unencrypted" with no success".
> 
> It is reasonable to not offer PLAIN authentication on an unencrypted 
> channel, so enabling TLS and using port 465 should be fine.
> 
Yes, or port 587 with STARTTLS, but now we're only guessing.
Following the instructions given by PlusNet is the way to go.

Back to alt.comp.software.thunderbird | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

"recipient rejected"? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-05-11 14:04 +0100
  Re: "recipient rejected"? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-05-11 16:44 +0100
    Re: "recipient rejected"? dillinger <dillinger@invalid.not> - 2026-05-11 18:23 +0200
      Re: "recipient rejected"? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2026-05-11 21:21 +0200
        Re: "recipient rejected"? dillinger <dillinger@invalid.not> - 2026-05-11 21:43 +0200
  Re: "recipient rejected"? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2026-05-11 18:13 +0200
  Re: "recipient rejected"? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2026-05-11 11:37 -0500
    Re: "recipient rejected"? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-05-11 20:04 +0100
      Re: "recipient rejected"? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-05-11 20:21 +0100
        Re: "recipient rejected"? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-05-11 20:33 +0100
          Re: "recipient rejected"? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-05-11 20:36 +0100
          Re: "recipient rejected"? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-05-11 20:39 +0100
            Re: "recipient rejected"? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-05-11 22:13 +0100
          Re: "recipient rejected"? Victor <Victor@invalid.invalid> - 2026-05-11 22:17 +0100

csiph-web