Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery"

From	Walter Duerson <liars@msnbc.com>
Newsgroups	alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, alt.arguments, alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns
Subject	Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery"
Date	2021-11-29 02:31 +0000
Organization	dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider
Message-ID	<XnsADF0BC784348FAOY3@0.0.0.0> (permalink)
References	(7 earlier) <rf5bkk$29ql$1@neodome.net> <4dedncoHzeN0r4vCnZ2dnUU7-IWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <XSvoJ.60619$lz3.10220@fx34.iad> <XnsADEF8845CEB660AR6@0.0.0.0> <nyxoJ.46309$Gco3.18584@fx01.iad>

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 27 Nov 2021, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> posted some 
news:nyxoJ.46309$Gco3.18584@fx01.iad:

> On 11/27/2021 1:23 PM, morbidly obese lying fat fuck Chadlee Bryant 
lied:
> 
>> On 27 Nov 2021, Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con> posted some
>> news:XSvoJ.60619$lz3.10220@fx34.iad:
>> 
>>> On 7/20/2020 5:12 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 7/20/20 7:07 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>> On 7/20/2020 4:46 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/20/20 6:04 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/20/2020 2:26 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/20/20 3:36 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2020 1:12 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/20 2:57 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2020 12:54 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No.  The 3/5 compromise was *not* anti-slavery.  Your
>>>>>>>>>>> subject line is a lie.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It gave the slavers something they didn't deserve.  It was
>>>>>>>>>>> pro-slavery.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Would you rather that the slaves had been counted for
>>>>>>>>>> representation
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If they didn't get to vote, they should not have been counted
>>>>>>>>> for representation at all.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then most of the people in the northern states should not have
>>>>>>>> been counted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They should have been the same as similarly situated people in the
>>>>>>> south.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just stop with the bullshit that the 3/5 compromise was
>>>>>>> "anti-slavery." It was not.  It was pro-slavery.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I said,
>>>>>
>>>>> You're full of shit.  Only really shitty sophistry can try to
>>>>> pretend the 3/5 compromise was "anti-slavery."  It wasn't - it was
>>>>> pro-slavery. It was a sop to the slavers.
>>>>
>>>> Without that compromise, there would not have been a USA.
>>>
>>> False.
>> 
>> �In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of 
the
>> 
> 
> southern white supremacists, who then were Democrats but today are 
> Republiscums/QAnon.

 Not true.  The racists and homophobes are still Democrats today.

Back to alt.arguments | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Walter Duerson <liars@msnbc.com> - 2021-11-29 02:31 +0000

csiph-web