Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| From | Walter Duerson <liars@msnbc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, alt.arguments, alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns |
| Subject | Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" |
| Date | 2021-11-29 02:29 +0000 |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
| Message-ID | <XnsADF0BC26DFC82AOY3@0.0.0.0> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <rf57tp$17hn$2@neodome.net> <ltWdna4F3oBbsYvCnZ2dnUU7-YmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <oSvoJ.60618$lz3.10071@fx34.iad> <XnsADEF8741C923B0AR6@0.0.0.0> <1xxoJ.46308$Gco3.16322@fx01.iad> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
On 27 Nov 2021, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> posted some news:1xxoJ.46308$Gco3.16322@fx01.iad: > On 11/27/2021 1:17 PM, morbidly obese lying fat fuck Chadlee Bryant > lied: >> On 27 Nov 2021, Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con> posted some >> news:oSvoJ.60618$lz3.10071@fx34.iad: >> >>> On 7/20/2020 4:46 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>> On 7/20/20 6:04 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>> On 7/20/2020 2:26 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>>>> On 7/20/20 3:36 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/20/2020 1:12 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/20/20 2:57 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2020 12:54 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No. The 3/5 compromise was *not* anti-slavery. Your >>>>>>>>> subject line is a lie. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It gave the slavers something they didn't deserve. It was >>>>>>>>> pro-slavery. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would you rather that the slaves had been counted for >>>>>>>> representation >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If they didn't get to vote, they should not have been counted >>>>>>> for representation at all. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then most of the people in the northern states should not have >>>>>> been counted. >>>>> >>>>> They should have been the same as similarly situated people in the >>>>> south. >>>>> >>>>> Just stop with the bullshit that the 3/5 compromise was >>>>> "anti-slavery." It was not. It was pro-slavery. >>>> >>>> As I said, on this subject you are stupid. >>> >>> No. Concession of defeat noted. >>> >>> The "compromise" was pro-slavery, in that it gave the slavers >>> political power they didn't deserve. >> >> The slavers were profiteering slaves and white Democrats! > > Slaves didn't own slaves. Southern Democrats then were conservatives. > Today, all white supremacists are Republiscums/QAnon. Former black slaves did own slaves in the South, Rudy. Read some history. Start with William Ellison Jr. and work your way out.
Back to alt.arguments | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Walter Duerson <liars@msnbc.com> - 2021-11-29 02:29 +0000
csiph-web