Groups > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh > #2289593

Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery"

From	Rudy Canoza <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups	alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject	Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery"
Date	2020-07-20 17:07 -0700
Organization	Neodome
Message-ID	<rf5bkk$29ql$1@neodome.net> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <kLCdnacfYMIFZ4jCnZ2dnUU7-N-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <rf4vam$18eq$1@neodome.net> <U5KdnRh3ebKPkYvCnZ2dnUU7-W3NnZ2d@giganews.com> <rf57tp$17hn$2@neodome.net> <ltWdna4F3oBbsYvCnZ2dnUU7-YmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/20/2020 4:46 PM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 7/20/20 6:04 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> On 7/20/2020 2:26 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>> On 7/20/20 3:36 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>> On 7/20/2020 1:12 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> On 7/20/20 2:57 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/20/2020 12:54 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No.  The 3/5 compromise was *not* anti-slavery.  Your subject line is 
>>>>>> a lie.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It gave the slavers something they didn't deserve.  It was pro-slavery.
>>>>>
>>>>> Would you rather that the slaves had been counted for representation
>>>>
>>>> If they didn't get to vote, they should not have been counted for 
>>>> representation at all.
>>>
>>> Then most of the people in the northern states should not have been 
>>> counted.
>>
>> They should have been the same as similarly situated people in the south.
>>
>> Just stop with the bullshit that the 3/5 compromise was "anti-slavery." 
>> It was not.  It was pro-slavery.
> 
> As I said,

You're full of shit.  Only really shitty sophistry can try to pretend the 
3/5 compromise was "anti-slavery."  It wasn't - it was pro-slavery.  It was 
a sop to the slavers.

Back to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

"Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" David Hartung <d_hartung@hotmail.com> - 2020-07-20 14:54 -0500
  Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2020-07-20 12:57 -0700
    Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" David Hartung <d_hartung@hotmail.com> - 2020-07-20 15:12 -0500
      Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" "edell@post.com" <edell@post.com> - 2020-07-20 13:34 -0700
      Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2020-07-20 13:36 -0700
        Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" David Hartung <d_hartung@hotmail.com> - 2020-07-20 16:26 -0500
          Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" "edell@post.com" <edell@post.com> - 2020-07-20 15:06 -0700
          Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2020-07-20 16:04 -0700
            Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" David Hartung <d_hartung@hotmail.com> - 2020-07-20 18:46 -0500
              Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2020-07-20 17:07 -0700
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" David Hartung <d_hartung@hotmail.com> - 2020-07-20 19:12 -0500
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2020-07-20 17:19 -0700
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" "edell@post.com" <edell@post.com> - 2020-07-20 17:57 -0700
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2020-07-20 21:03 -0500
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" David Hartung <d_hartung@hotmail.com> - 2020-07-20 21:58 -0500
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2020-07-20 20:02 -0700
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" David Hartung <d_hartung@hotmail.com> - 2020-07-21 07:43 -0500
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2020-07-21 08:14 -0700
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" "edell@post.com" <edell@post.com> - 2020-07-20 20:18 -0700
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" David Hartung <d_hartung@hotmail.com> - 2020-07-21 07:48 -0500
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" "edell@post.com" <edell@post.com> - 2020-07-21 06:02 -0700
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2020-07-21 08:23 -0500
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" wsjames123@gmail.com - 2020-07-21 06:35 -0700
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" David Hartung <d_hartung@hotmail.com> - 2020-07-21 08:37 -0500
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" "edell@post.com" <edell@post.com> - 2020-07-21 06:43 -0700
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2020-07-21 21:47 -0500
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" wsjames123@gmail.com - 2020-07-21 20:10 -0700
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Derek LaHousse <kyk.wieber.ass@always.forever> - 2020-07-21 20:40 -0700
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" wsjames123@gmail.com - 2020-07-21 21:01 -0700
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" OrigInfoJunkie <bondrock@att.net> - 2020-07-21 12:03 -0700
                Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2020-07-21 08:16 -0700
          Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" wsjames123@gmail.com - 2020-07-21 06:19 -0700
      Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2020-07-20 13:48 -0700
      Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2020-07-20 21:07 -0500
        Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" David Hartung <d_hartung@hotmail.com> - 2020-07-20 22:00 -0500
          Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2020-07-20 20:03 -0700
          Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" "edell@post.com" <edell@post.com> - 2020-07-20 20:13 -0700
          Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizont.net> - 2020-07-21 08:19 -0500
  Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" "edell@post.com" <edell@post.com> - 2020-07-20 13:18 -0700
    wy the Racist, Raises His Fat Ugly Head AlleyCat <al@aohell.com> - 2020-07-20 19:20 -0500
      Re: wy the Racist, Raises His Fat Ugly Head David Hartung <d_hartung@hotmail.com> - 2020-07-20 19:54 -0500
        Re: wy the Racist, Raises His Fat Ugly Head AlleyCat <al@aohell.com> - 2020-07-20 20:20 -0500
        Re: wy the Racist, Raises His Fat Ugly Head AlleyCat <al@aohell.com> - 2020-07-20 20:20 -0500
  Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <j_carlson@gmx.com> - 2020-07-20 13:57 -0700

csiph-web