Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh > #2467330

Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery"

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 27 Nov 2021, Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con> posted some
news:XSvoJ.60619$lz3.10220@fx34.iad: 

> On 7/20/2020 5:12 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 7/20/20 7:07 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>> On 7/20/2020 4:46 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 7/20/20 6:04 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>> On 7/20/2020 2:26 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/20/20 3:36 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/20/2020 1:12 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/20/20 2:57 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/2020 12:54 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No.Ā  The 3/5 compromise was *not* anti-slavery.Ā  Your
>>>>>>>>> subject line is a lie.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It gave the slavers something they didn't deserve.Ā  It was
>>>>>>>>> pro-slavery. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Would you rather that the slaves had been counted for
>>>>>>>> representation 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If they didn't get to vote, they should not have been counted
>>>>>>> for representation at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then most of the people in the northern states should not have
>>>>>> been counted. 
>>>>>
>>>>> They should have been the same as similarly situated people in the
>>>>> south. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Just stop with the bullshit that the 3/5 compromise was
>>>>> "anti-slavery." It was not.Ā  It was pro-slavery.
>>>>
>>>> As I said,
>>>
>>> You're full of shit.Ā  Only really shitty sophistry can try to
>>> pretend the 3/5 compromise was "anti-slavery."Ā  It wasn't - it was
>>> pro-slavery. It was a sop to the slavers.
>> 
>> Without that compromise, there would not have been a USA.
> 
> False.

“In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the 
Democratic Party.”

President Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat, shared many views with the Klan. He 
re-segregated many federal agencies, and even screened the first movie 
ever played at the White House - the racist film “The Birth of a Nation,” 
originally entitled “The Clansman.”

A few decades later, the only serious congressional opposition to the 
landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 came from Democrats. Eighty percent of 
Republicans in Congress supported the bill. Less than 70 percent of
Democrats did. Democratic senators filibustered the bill for 75 days, 
until Republicans mustered the few extra votes needed to break the logjam.

And when all of their efforts to enslave blacks, keep them enslaved, and 
then keep them from voting had failed, the Democrats came up with a new 
strategy: If black people are going to vote, they might as well vote for 
Democrats. As President Lyndon Johnson was purported to have said about 
the Civil Rights Act, “I’ll have them n*****s voting Democrat for two 
hundred years.”

So now, the Democratic Party prospers on the votes of the very people it 
has spent much of its history oppressing.

Democrats falsely claim that the Republican Party is the villain, when in 
reality it’s the failed policies of the Democratic Party that have kept 
blacks down. Massive government welfare has decimated the black family. 
Opposition to school choice has kept them trapped in failing schools. 
Politically correct policing has left black neighborhoods defenseless 
against violent crime.

So, when you think about racial equality and civil rights, which political 
party should come to mind?

Back to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con> - 2021-11-27 11:42 -0800
  Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Mitch <bankrupt@cnn.com> - 2021-11-27 21:23 +0000
    Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> - 2021-11-27 13:37 -0800
      Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Walter Duerson <liars@msnbc.com> - 2021-11-29 02:31 +0000
        Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 18:54 -0800

csiph-web