Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #221882
| From | l0f4r0@tuta.io |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? |
| Date | 2020-04-24 00:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <zYS2Z-7mT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <zD4Nz-1jq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <zDhUw-U6-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <zDndw-3VZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <zUrNL-747-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <zUsqu-7hP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi, 11 avr. 2020 à 19:48 de scdbackup@gmx.net: > l0f4r0@tuta.io wrote: > >> I don't really >> think Linux is intrinsically more secure than Windows nowadays (a >> vulnerability remains as such) but I really think Linux ecosystem is. >> > This might be a merciful misperception. To my theory, free virus producers > are just much better programmers than those of MS-Windows malware. > > "When you do things right, people won’t be sure you’ve done anything > at all." - Futurama > Could you explain that please? 12 avr. 2020 à 00:01 de joe@jretrading.com: > (Most) Linux users are horrified by the thought of surfing the Web with > root privileges, most Windows users are not even aware that their > computers can be run at one of two privilege levels (many more with the > business/professional versions). > Yes, and if they are aware of that, they tend to think more is better. Least privilege in security is a leading principle but for the average person it's just seen as useless/unfair restrictions. People may feel less powerful and don't understand why they don't have full permissions. 12 avr. 2020 à 08:52 de andreimpopescu@gmail.com: > On Sb, 11 apr 20, 19:06:59, > l0f4r0@tuta.io> wrote: > >> * Most softwares are downloaded through official preconfigured >> repositories. Users are less prone to download malware on suspicions >> websites >> > There are sufficient tutorials advising to download random scripts and > run with root privileges. > >> * Updates are easier as well because tracked/centralized through >> repositories themselves for the most part. On Windows you need to >> check Windows Update + Windows Store + each application individually >> > Would be the same on Debian if you chose to install additional software > with some other package manager and debs downloaded from whatever > website. > Yes, of course, you're right. That is why I used "most" 2 times ;) Indeed, users are free to go off-piste. >> * Open source is more common on Linux (community-based) than Windows >> (money-based) so theoretically anyone competent enough could view the >> source by oneself and spot a malovelent behavior (/!\ in practice this >> is not so easy, see what happened with OpenSSL / HeartBleed) >> > You probably mean Linus's law[2]. Unfortunately the reverse is true as > well: without sufficient eyeballs there will be many bugs. > Thanks, I didn't know about this designation. 12 avr. 2020 à 18:25 de celejar@gmail.com: > On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 17:41:54 +0200 > <> tomas@tuxteam.de> > wrote: > >> Trust is a complex beast. At its bottom it can't be completely >> rational, but usually you trust a community because you somehow >> think you understand how it works and you trust the information >> chain linking you to that community. >> > Exactly. So if I trust the Sandstorm community (for example - I know > nothing about them), then I'm not sure that there's any particularly > great risk in installing their product via "curl | bash", and if I > don't trust them, I shouldn't install their product via any other > mechanism either. > Yes, this is the basics. But you can encounter dangerous situations later that can easily jeopardize your initial trust, e.g: owner's change. A black hat can register some expired/deleted legitimate resources (website, account) and start serving malware instead while current users are not aware... Tomas has mentioned another variant with event-stream where a volonteer (but ultimately malevolent) person simply asked to take over the maintenance. So I would say that trust is a perpetual exercise. Best regards, l0f4r0
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? l0f4r0@tuta.io - 2020-04-11 19:10 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2020-04-11 19:50 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? l0f4r0@tuta.io - 2020-04-24 00:00 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-04-24 02:50 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> - 2020-04-24 04:00 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? "Rick Thomas" <rick.thomas@pobox.com> - 2020-04-24 08:50 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2020-04-24 09:00 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? l0f4r0@tuta.io - 2020-05-03 18:20 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2020-05-03 20:00 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? l0f4r0@tuta.io - 2020-05-04 01:40 +0200
systemd-homed (was Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation?) Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> - 2020-05-04 02:10 +0200
Re: systemd-homed "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2020-05-04 09:20 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2020-04-12 00:10 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-12 09:10 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-12 09:20 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-12 09:10 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2020-04-12 17:40 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-04-12 21:10 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-12 09:00 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-12 09:20 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-12 10:40 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-12 11:00 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-12 11:50 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-12 12:10 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-12 15:10 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-12 15:50 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-12 17:50 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-04-12 17:30 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-04-12 17:40 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2020-04-12 16:50 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-12 17:50 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2020-04-12 18:30 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-04-12 20:50 +0200
Re: Anti-malware for my personal Debian workstation? John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-04-12 19:40 +0200
csiph-web