Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12395

Re: Python3.8 as default final status

Show all headers | View raw

On March 28, 2020 5:10:42 AM UTC, Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@debian.org> wrote:
>On Friday, March 27 2020, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote:
>
>> On 27.03.2020 20:09, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>>> On Friday, March 27 2020, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> 
>>>> The python3-defaults with python3.8 as the default python3 has
>migrated to 
>>>> Testing thanks to the release team hammering things around until it
>went.
>>> 
>>> Thanks for this.
>>> 
>>>> Most of the outstanding autipkgtest failures with python3.8 were
>fixed either 
>>>> in unstable or in git/BTS.  Here are the remaining issues that
>someone (who 
>>>> isn't me) should have a look at:
>>>>
>>>> celery/4.2.1-5: #952217 autorm 4/13
>>> 
>>> FWIW, I looked at this a little bit, but could not make much
>progress.
>>> I'm very interested in fixing this since it impacts pagure.  I'll
>try to
>>> investigate more this weekend, but if someone else wants to take a
>look
>>> (and let me know), you're more than welcome!
>>> 
>>
>> I believe I already fixed that package, it's waiting for someone to
>> review and upload it. Did you look at the repository in salsa?
>
>I had looked at the repository when I was working with the package.
>I see you pushed your changes 2 days ago, but the last time I looked at
>the package was at least 7 days ago.
>
>Anyhow, I thank you for letting me know, but I am not sure I am
>satisfied with the solution.  You basically disabled the test on Python
>3.8, which obviously works, but doesn't really tell me whether there
>was
>indeed a problem with the package/testcase or not.

I completely agree.  It's just papering over the problem.  It's not in the spirit of the Debian Social Contract (#3).

>My approach (failed, so far) was to try and figure out what was
>happening, and then devise a proper fix for it.  My next step was going
>to be to involve upstream in this.
>
>Would you like to follow up with them and check if they're are aware of
>the failure?  Maybe they already have a proper solution for it.

Upstream should definitely be involved.

Scott K

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Python3.8 as default final status Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-03-27 16:20 +0100
  Re: Python3.8 as default final status Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@debian.org> - 2020-03-27 20:10 +0100
    Re: Python3.8 as default final status Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-03-27 20:40 +0100
      Re: Python3.8 as default final status Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-03-27 20:50 +0100
    Re: Python3.8 as default final status Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@debian.org> - 2020-03-28 06:20 +0100
      Re: Python3.8 as default final status Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-03-28 07:20 +0100
        Re: Python3.8 as default final status Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@debian.org> - 2020-04-04 07:10 +0200
  Re: Python3.8 as default final status Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2020-03-27 20:50 +0100

csiph-web