Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #66481

Re: Recurrent alerts "Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled"

From Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.kernel
Subject Re: Recurrent alerts "Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled"
Date 2020-03-09 02:20 +0100
Message-ID <zIffj-Rj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <zlivE-3d3-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <zlslj-F6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <zqnuF-nF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <zqMMq-7ca-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Mon, 2020-01-20 at 14:27 -0700, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Hi L0f4r0,
> 
> Ben (or other team members), if you're reading this and are short on
> time, would you please skip to the question at the bottom and reply to
> it?
[...]
> So anyways, given that you have a new ultrabook with a powerful CPU, I
> think thermald is probably the best solution to try.  You can read about
> how it combines many other methods and aims to solve the problems
> inherent to ultrabooks here (01.org is the Intel open source project):
> 
>   https://01.org/linux-thermal-daemon/documentation/introduction-thermal-daemon
> 
> Ben (and team), is there any reason why thermald isn't part of
> task-laptop?  If it solves L0f4r0's issue it might be worth adding it,
> and if it's true that laptops...these new ultrabooks...are being
> designed to require it (eg: insufficient cooling solution) then it would
> make sense to enable it for the general case that it purportedly solves.

If thermald doesn't require manual configuration, and its default
behaviour is reasonable on all laptops, then I think it should be added
to task-laptop.  However, currently all tasks are arch-independent
packages while thermald is x86-only.

If thermald doesn't behave reasonably on some laptops, or if there's
some reason why tasksel should not build arch-dependent packages, we
would need to find some other way to get it installed by default on the
laptops where it's really needed.

Anyway, this should be discussed on the debian-boot list, which is the
maintainer address for tasksel.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance.
                                                       - Robert Coveyou


Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Recurrent alerts "Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock  throttled" <l0f4r0@tuta.io> - 2020-01-05 19:10 +0100
  Re: Recurrent alerts "Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled" Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com> - 2020-01-06 05:40 +0100
    Re: Recurrent alerts "Package temperature above threshold, cpu  clock throttled" <l0f4r0@tuta.io> - 2020-01-19 19:30 +0100
      Re: Recurrent alerts "Package temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled" Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com> - 2020-01-20 22:30 +0100
        Re: Recurrent alerts "Package temperature above threshold, cpu  clock throttled" Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2020-03-09 02:20 +0100
      Re: Recurrent alerts "Package temperature above threshold, cpu  clock throttled" l0f4r0@tuta.io - 2020-03-08 22:50 +0100
        Re: Recurrent alerts "Package temperature above threshold, cpu  clock throttled" Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2020-03-09 02:20 +0100
      Re: Recurrent alerts "Package temperature above threshold, cpu  clock throttled" l0f4r0@tuta.io - 2020-04-02 00:40 +0200
        Re: Recurrent alerts "Package temperature above threshold, cpu  clock throttled" l0f4r0@tuta.io - 2020-04-02 15:30 +0200
  Re: Recurrent alerts "Package temperature above threshold, cpu  clock throttled" <l0f4r0@tuta.io> - 2020-01-20 00:30 +0100

csiph-web