Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #219475
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: new, not nice web bots disposal |
| Date | 2020-02-26 15:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <zE5Rf-880-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <zE0HT-3Z7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <zE2To-6lY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <zE3mr-6vP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | none,nada,zip |
On Wednesday 26 February 2020 06:40:39 Roger Price wrote: > On Wed, 26 Feb 2020, Dan Ritter wrote: > > If you find yourself needing to add lots more rules, you might want > > to generate a "set" instead of individual rules: > > > > http://ipset.netfilter.org/ > > https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/advanced-firewall-configuration > >s-ipset might be useful. > > I find ipsets the natural way of setting up rules. I run a script > which blocks whole countries, taking the country data from > http://ipverse.net/ipblocks/data/countries/ > > Simple and efficient. I once had a set with 140000 (yes, 140 > thousand) ipblocks in an ipset with no apparent performance hit. > > Roger Roger, and anyone else following along, I am blocking 12544 with 49 rules. based on 49 rules, each blocking /24 addresses. Seems to be sufficient. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable. - Louis D. Brandeis Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
new, not nice web bots disposal Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-02-26 10:00 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2020-02-26 10:20 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-02-26 15:10 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-02-26 15:30 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2020-02-26 10:30 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-02-26 15:20 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-02-26 12:20 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Roger Price <debian@rogerprice.org> - 2020-02-26 12:50 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-02-26 15:30 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Klaus Singvogel <deb-user-ml@singvogel.net> - 2020-02-26 15:30 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-02-26 14:30 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-02-26 15:50 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Roger Price <debian@rogerprice.org> - 2020-02-26 16:50 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-02-26 20:10 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2020-02-26 20:00 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-02-26 20:00 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-02-26 20:20 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-02-26 20:30 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-02-26 20:50 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-02-26 22:10 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-02-26 22:50 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2020-02-27 05:30 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-02-27 06:10 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-02-27 10:00 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-02-27 14:30 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-02-27 15:20 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-02-27 15:40 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-02-27 16:00 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-02-27 16:20 +0100
OT: LIbrarian (was: Re: new, not nice web bots disposal) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2020-02-27 16:40 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-02-27 10:00 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2020-02-27 16:10 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal tomas@tuxteam.de - 2020-02-27 16:20 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2020-02-27 16:40 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-02-27 19:40 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-02-27 10:00 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-02-27 14:20 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-02-27 15:20 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2020-02-28 06:20 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-02-26 20:20 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2020-02-26 20:50 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-02-26 21:00 +0100
Re: new, not nice web bots disposal Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2020-02-26 22:30 +0100
csiph-web