Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #219345
| From | Anastasios Lisgaras <tasosnumberten@yahoo.gr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. |
| Date | 2020-02-22 20:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <zCIDn-4vX-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <zBwuC-1vz-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <zBxTH-2ey-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <zCAwa-7X9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <zCAwa-7X9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <zCHHk-3XR-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2/22/20 8:05 PM, didier.gaumet@gmail.com wrote: > Le samedi 22 février 2020 11:50:05 UTC+1, Anastasios Lisgaras a écrit : > > For the hardware already known to the kernel, the later will try to load a firmware when needed. So a search of the 'firmware" word in the kernel logs would show either succeeded or failed attempts: > > didier@hp-notebook14:~$ sudo dmesg | grep -i firmware > [...] Thanks a lot for describing the above procedure. I suppose this procedure is very important after every distribution installation, isn't it? In my case, I have the following results: :~# dmesg | grep -i firmware [ 3.960306] radeon 0000:01:00.0: firmware: direct-loading firmware radeon/oland_pfp.bin [ 3.961037] radeon 0000:01:00.0: firmware: direct-loading firmware radeon/oland_me.bin [ 3.961648] radeon 0000:01:00.0: firmware: direct-loading firmware radeon/oland_ce.bin [ 3.961886] radeon 0000:01:00.0: firmware: direct-loading firmware radeon/oland_rlc.bin [ 3.962223] radeon 0000:01:00.0: firmware: direct-loading firmware radeon/oland_mc.bin [ 3.962754] radeon 0000:01:00.0: firmware: direct-loading firmware radeon/oland_smc.bin [ 3.972636] radeon 0000:01:00.0: firmware: direct-loading firmware radeon/TAHITI_uvd.bin [ 3.973251] radeon 0000:01:00.0: firmware: direct-loading firmware radeon/TAHITI_vce.bin [ 3.973995] [drm] Found VCE firmware/feedback version 50.0.1 / 17! [ 8.426598] r8169 0000:0a:00.0: firmware: direct-loading firmware rtl_nic/rtl8168f-1.fw [14666.667585] ACPI: [Firmware Bug]: BIOS _OSI(Linux) query ignored I think all is well, isn't it? Because the last line worries me a little. > [14666.667585] ACPI: [Firmware Bug]: BIOS _OSI(Linux) query ignored > > [...] > > - *sure*: I don't think so > - a bit more risky: the previous link I gave: > https://wiki.debian.org/SystemDowngrade > Instead I doing system downgrade to go back, what do you say to i did upgrade and go ahead to the Debian version 10 (codename buster) ? Maybe it makes things worse? Let's try what Nektarios suggested in a previous e-mail, to I login from terminal ( Alt + F4 ) and uninstall completely and then reinstall the GNOME desktop environment ?? P.S.: Anyway it's crazy that I'm typing this message *from this computer right now*. I'm afraid to shutting down because maybe it doesn't load my GNOME desktop environment again. *Doesn't this make you look crazy*? 10 times not loading the GNOME environment and and the last one to load it ? Thank you for your time. -- Kind regards, Tasos
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Nektarios Katakis <nektarios@mail.nektarioskatakis.xyz> - 2020-02-17 15:40 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. didier.gaumet@gmail.com - 2020-02-17 18:10 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Nektarios Katakis <nektarios@mail.nektarioskatakis.xyz> - 2020-02-18 14:50 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. David Anthony <david.fosdick.anthony@gmail.com> - 2020-02-19 02:40 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-02-19 07:00 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. didier.gaumet@gmail.com - 2020-02-19 12:00 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Nektarios Katakis <nektarios@mail.nektarioskatakis.xyz> - 2020-02-19 12:20 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2020-02-19 12:40 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-02-19 14:50 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2020-02-19 13:20 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-02-19 14:50 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Anastasios Lisgaras <tasosnumberten@yahoo.gr> - 2020-02-22 11:50 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. didier.gaumet@gmail.com - 2020-02-22 19:30 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Anastasios Lisgaras <tasosnumberten@yahoo.gr> - 2020-02-22 20:30 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. didier.gaumet@gmail.com - 2020-02-22 23:10 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. Anastasios Lisgaras <tasosnumberten@yahoo.gr> - 2020-02-23 00:40 +0100
Re: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) was broken after upgraded from stretch-backports. didier.gaumet@gmail.com - 2020-02-23 11:20 +0100
csiph-web