Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #5716
| From | Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security |
| Subject | Re: debcheckroot v2.0 released |
| Date | 2019-11-21 14:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <z4UGZ-4Pz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <z4UnE-4J4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Am 21.11.19 um 13:59 schrieb Odo Poppinger: > Am 20.11.19 um 12:29 schrieb Elmar Stellnberger: >> debcheckroot is targeted at technically experienced users. No way to >> hunt rootkits authored by the NSA otherwise. You have to be a tough >> user to take this challenge! Well you can of course also use it for >> other kinds of rootkits by other governments or from criminals but >> interpreting the results requires some kind of knowledge about a >> Linux system. You need to know what the kernel is, what an initrd is, >> what you can find under /bin, /usr/bin, /sbin and /usr/sbin. >> >> The tool has primarily been written against 5 eyes rootkits but I >> think it is still missing some features to take this challenge. f.i. >> it should be possible to unpack *.deb-s in an own boot run, separate >> from downloading and verification. That would shield against attacks >> targeted at the unpacking which affect the very system debcheckroot >> runs on. Supporting file only repos for customly downloaded and >> installed packages like my printer driver would also be an issue. >> > Why not simply use sha256 - lists as can already be used and generated > with debcheckroot (as far as I have seen)? That would resolve the > problem of a possible infection of the host system running > debcheckroot because there are no archives that need to be unpacked > when using plain sha256 file lists. We would only need some official > support by Debian for this, i.e. someone who creates/updates these > sha256 lists every time the updates repository is updated and puts > them online in a publicly known place. Yes, that is a very good idea!: * debcheckroot with sha256-lists is considerably faster because it does not need to download and unpack all packages * unknown/forgotten packages of elder versions could still be checked because the sha256sums are not forgotten * You can generate sha256sums incrementally with debcheckroot, i.e. extend an existing list only for the new packages
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: debcheckroot v2.0 released Odo Poppinger <odopopp@gmail.com> - 2019-11-21 14:10 +0100 Re: debcheckroot v2.0 released Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@gmail.com> - 2019-11-21 14:30 +0100 Re: debcheckroot v2.0 released Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@gmail.com> - 2019-11-25 22:20 +0100
csiph-web